AI-generated

Respondent denies owing £1000 marriage portion to husband and denies entitlement to £1000 legacy from Macalister’s estate, asserting only £10 annual rent for Clachamish farm under father’s trust.

AI-generated

Nominal pursuers seek recalculation of fund in medio for £1000 legacy, claiming interest from father’s death after litigation resolved.

AI-generated

Claimants Mrs Rymer/Waddell and her husband seek interim payment from fund in medio, asserting alimentary rights over £700, while Mrs Smith contests an assignation to the fund from her deceased brother.

AI-generated

Answers by the claimants to the argument that their alimentary provision is subject to the claims of non-alimentary creditors

AI-generated

Court ranks claim for £191 interest against £700 general payment to Mrs Rymer, favoring Mrs Adam’s 1826 assignation over Waddell’s 1834 claim.

AI-generated

Creditors consent to Michael Gilfillan’s discharge application after 18 months from sequestration, with trustee authorizing concurrence.

AI-generated

Defender objects to witness Urquhart’s admissibility on interest/agency grounds; pursuers rebut, saying his testimony is necessary and impartial to resolve whether crop sales extinguished rent.

AI-generated

John Mill’s 1825–1833 rent payments for Forestmill farm, via crop sales and discounted bills, referenced in Moir’s deposition, with objections to witness Hugh Mackenzie Urquhart’s admissibility due to interest and agency.

AI-generated

Defendants Robert and George Mill deny owing unpaid rent for 1832 crop, asserting it was settled via Mr. Jameson and Mr. Urquhart’s transactions, and that Robert Mill’s later claims are pretextual.

AI-generated

Defender Robert Mill pleads that Mr Urquhart, acting as Mr Jameson’s clerk and representative, handled farm sales and accounts, and that Mr Jameson cannot disclaim responsibility for those acts.