SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Defenders deny liability for Gray’s claim, asserting they warranted only against known claims, not unknown ones, and relied on pursuer’s submitted renunciation letter.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer seeks to have interlocutor altered to separate relief action from original action and to recover expenses against William Kerr.

Abstract

AI-generated

Reclaiming Petition of Daniel Kerr Gray, against Lord Jeffrey's interlocutor

Abstract

AI-generated

Statement of Facts for Campbell of Glensaddell and Pursuer's Answers with Pleas in Law

Abstract

AI-generated

Alexander Macalister sues tenants and trustees for trespassing on his coastal lands to collect wreck and shell-sand, seeking interdict and damages.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defenders challenge pursuer's exclusive claim to shell-sand and wreck on tidal shores adjacent to their lands, arguing the grant lacks such rights and possession is not exclusive.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondent Gray seeks to interdict Mr. Railton’s poindings of Jacques’s goods, claiming authority under joint creditor measures; Mr. Pullman denies wrongdoing and asserts his right to revoke the mandate.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petition to reclaim sheriff's judgment declaring diligence on original promissory note invalid after composition agreement.

Abstract

AI-generated

Court allows Pullman to join as party; Lord Ordinary upholds Sheriff’s interdict, finding Railton lacked valid mandate for diligence.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondent seeks to interdict creditor’s diligence, asserting exclusive right to debt and invalidity of advocator’s actions without Pullman’s authority.

Subscribe to

William Kerr v. Mrs. Elizabeth Kerr, and Others, Representatives of Daniel Kerr — Answers, 14 May 1836

Daniel Kerr Gray v. William Kerr — Reclaiming Note

REC. NOTE—DANIEL KERR GRAY, AGAINST Lord Jeffrey's Interlocutor.

STATEMENT of FACTS for Campbell of Glensaddell, &c. AND PURSUER'S ANSWERS thereto.

Alexander Macalister v. John Campbell and Others — 14 Jan 1834

Alexander Macalister v. John Campbell and David Stewart Galbreath, Esqrs. of Glensaddell, and their Tenants, and John Campbell, Esq. of Stonefield, and Others, Trustees of the late Dugald Campbell, Esq. of Kildalloig… — Respondents' Case, 1 Sep 1836

Respondent's STATEMENT of FACTS and ANSWERS thereto.

RECLAIMING NOTE FOR EDWARD RAILTON, Agent in Glasgow ; ROBERT PULLMAN, Merchant in London ; and JOHN CULLEN, W.S., his Mandatory. IN

Reclaiming Note, E. Railton, & R. Pullman & Mandatory against Lord Fullerton's Interlocutor

Edward Railton v. Alexander Gray — Note, 14 May 1834