Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Thomas Ridley and Company and Frederick A. Bell v. William Sloan — Replies

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents deny defendant's lien on consigned goods, asserting property belongs to them and defendant cannot claim freight due to third party.

Thomas Ridley and Company and Frederick A Bell v. William Sloan — Reclaiming Petition, 5 Jan 1836

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaiming Petition of William Sloan, respondent, asking the Court to remit the cause simpliciter to the Sheriff and find him entitled to expenses

VI.—Excerpt from page 7 of CLAIM for Defender, Mr Gordon, No. 15 of productions in the Submission, being No. 8 of Submission, titled, Answers for Geo. Gordon, Esquire, to the Claim

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender seeks to offset tenant’s rent claims by deducting unpaid improvements and disputed lime value, while tenant counters with claims for omitted dung deductions and misapplied acreage.

John Calder v. George Gordon — 22 Jan 1834

Abstract
AI-generated
Tenant sued landlord for breach of lease and arbitration misconduct after sequestration and disputed submission.

John Calder v. George Gordon — Reclaiming Petition, 14 Dec 1836 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
John Calder, formerly of Buxburn now in Aberdeen, seeks court to alter an interlocutor against George Gordon over a disputed arbitral decree.

John Calder v. George Gordon — Reclaiming Note, 14 Dec 1836

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender successfully defended against reduction of arbitral decree; court finds pursuer liable for expenses and rejects six grounds for reduction.

The Earl of Strathmore's Trustees v. Thomas Bowes, Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorn — Revised Case, 19 Jan 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer challenges validity of contested deeds and duplicates due to extensive erasures and superinductions, seeking reduction of instruments deemed vitiated in substantialibus.

Janet Clunie v. William Drysdale — Answers, 15 Feb 1831

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by William Drysdale to the condescendence for Janet Clunie, denying and asserting irrelevance of claims regarding meetings and threats not deponed to by other witnesses.

Janet Clunie v. William Drysdale — Condescendence and Answers, 28 May 1830

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer Janet Clunie seeks aliment for child born out of wedlock, alleging defender William Drysdale is father; defender denies paternity and all prior illicit relations.

James Tait, John Guthrie Tait, William Hunter, and James Merkle, Trustees for Mrs Isabella Campbell Maria Moffat or Tait v. Robert Wilson — Condescendence

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender Robert Wilson, agent for a congregation, granted personal obligation to secure a loan from the Moffats, later disputed over security, interest defaults, and failure to pay feu duties.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 260
  • Page 261
  • Page 262
  • Page 263
  • Current page 264
  • Page 265
  • Page 266
  • Page 267
  • Page 268
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in