Petition — Hugh Rose, Esq. against Lord Pitmilly's Interlocutors
Abstract
Hugh Rose challenges Lord Pitmilly’s denial of damages, arguing malicious prior conduct and false accusations justify no expenses.
Campbell Mackintosh v. Lockhart Kinloch — Answers, 4 Apr 1822 [2]
Abstract
Answers by Lockhart Kinloch and others to the petition of Campbell Mackintosh, asserting that the petitioner remains bound by prior bonds and cannot evade responsibility by citing later securities.
Petition — Campbell Mackintosh, Esq. against Lord Alloway's Interlocutor [2]
Abstract
Petition of Campbell Mackintosh asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
William Rodger v. Cunningham and Simpson — Answers, 29 May 1822
Abstract
Respondents claim proportional share of seized goods, disputing petitioner’s mandatory role and action’s validity under new bankruptcy law.
William Rodger v. Cunningham and Simpson — Answers, 5 Feb 1822 [2]
Abstract
Respondents answer petition challenging court’s authority to remit case with instructions after extract, asserting procedural invalidity and hardship.
Petition — William Rodger against Lord Alloway's Interlocutor [2]
Abstract
Petitioner challenges Lord Ordinary’s remittance of expenses to inferior court, claiming it exceeds his jurisdiction.
Andrew Boyes and Robert Livingston v. Ann Higgins — Answers, 30 May 1822
Abstract
Respondents, officers of a tailors' benefit society, defend against a widow’s claim for funeral aid, asserting her late husband’s prior expulsion for theft forfeited his membership and benefits.
Petition — Duke of Roxburghe against Inner House Interlocutor
Abstract
Duke of Roxburghe seeks review of interlocutor upholding trustee’s bona fide possession of Wester Grange rents, disputing accounting and equitable doctrine application.
James, Duke of Roxburghe v. John Wauchope — Appendix to Answers, 20 May 1822
Abstract
Appendix to Answers shows deficit in personal estates and surplus in heritable estates, including post-1813 London sale proceeds.
Sir William Kerr v. John Wauchope — Appendix, 13 Jun 1822
Abstract
Appendix to Answer filed by John Wauchope, trustee for creditors of the late Duke of Roxburghe, in response to Sir William Kerr’s petition demanding proof of title to Fairnington lands.
