SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Complainer seeks to establish date of annuity letter via marriage and payment records, countering respondent’s evasion of factual admissions.

Abstract

AI-generated

Claimant seeks rank as creditor on father's sequestrated estate for annuity obligation granted in 1814, contested by trustee on grounds of insolvency and date of obligation.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petition of William Dixon asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Abstract

AI-generated

Carrick, trustee, seeks to void a 1820 composition contract with creditors; Dixon replies that Carrick approved and participated in it, and now challenges it too late.

Abstract

AI-generated

Creditor Dixon challenges a court-approved composition, claiming unfair advantage by accepting goods instead of cash while others paid cash.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petition of William Dixon asking the Court to recall the interlocutor that declared James Edington discharged, to reinstate the sequestration and permit the petitioner to oppose the composition-contract.

Abstract

AI-generated

Respondent seeks inhibition against petitioner to prevent evasion of accounting for funds held under sequestration composition.

Abstract

AI-generated

Mr Drysdale protests Barry's inhibition of Mr Geddes, alleging it is malicious and improperly used by Barry through his agent.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petition delivered to agent for poor David Barry via copies.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petition of John Geddes, asking the Court to recall the inhibition used by Poor David Barry, against whom the petitioner has no claim to personal diligence.

Subscribe to

Mackay Hugh Scott v. The Trustee on the Sequestrated Estate of Scott & M'Bean — Condescendence, 9 Apr 1814 [2]

Mackay Hugh Scott v. John Ross — Information, 19 Jan 1822

Petition — William Dixon, Esq

William Carrick v. William Dixon — Duplies, 6 Mar 1822 [2]

Answers — Ans.—Wm. Carrick, to Pet.—Wm

Petition — William Dixon, Esq. in James Edington's Application for Discharge

John Geddes v. David Barry — Answers, 3 Jun 1822

APPENDIX. LETTER.—Mr Drysdale to Mr M^cAllan, W. S. about Barry's Inhibition.

APPENDIX.

Petition — Inc. Pet.—John Geddes for Recall of Inhibition used by Poor David Barry, W