SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Pursuer claims special bequest of £2000 in satisfaction of equal footing with siblings; defenders deny revocation and assert provision remains valid.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuer claims trustees failed to pay £2000 provision from father’s 1817 settlement, arguing transfer of bank stock was not extinguishing the trust.

Abstract

AI-generated

Reclaimer seeks to overturn an interlocutor and recover expenses in an action against George Robertson and his trustees, based on his will and codicils.

Abstract

AI-generated

Court upholds defender’s position that testator’s advance to pursuer satisfied testamentary provision, dismissing claim for L2000.

Abstract

AI-generated

Creditors consent to discharge of James Buchanan, junior, of debts prior to sequestration, after statutory compliance and creditor majority approval.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuers claim defender obtained invalid discharge by misrepresenting their withdrawn consent to discharge, despite additional debts and trustee’s erroneous reports.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defender defends discharge obtained with creditors' consent, despite later claims of fraud and withdrawal of consent.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defender seeks to uphold 1829 statutory discharge, resisting creditors’ claim that post-discharge consent withdrawal invalidates it.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defender James Buchanan responds to pursuers Reid, Irving, and Company in a reduction action, with revised cases to be printed and boxed by November sederunt-day.

Abstract

AI-generated

Petition to authorize mother as factrix for minor daughter, appointed executrix-dative to manage deceased sister’s estate.

Subscribe to

James Hunter Robertson v. Trustees of the late George Robertson — Condescendence

James Hunter Robertson v. Trustees of the late George Robertson — Condescendence, 1 Feb 1832

RECLAIMING NOTE FOR JAMES HUNTER ROBERTSON, Esq. Banker in Greenock;

RECLAIMING NOTE. JAMES H. ROBERTSON, Esq. AGAINST LORD MONCREIFF'S INTERLOCUTOR.

Reid, Irving and Company v. James Buchanan, Junior — State of the Process, 21 Dec 1832

Reid, Irving, and Company and Others v. James Buchanan Junior — State of the Process

Reid, Irving and Company v. James Buchanan, Junior — Answers, 20 May 1836 [2]

Reid, Irving and Company against James Buchanan — Respondents' Case, 15 Nov 1837

Reid, Irving, and Company v. James Buchanan — Respondents' Case, 5 Oct 1837

Lowden & Wightman v. Miss Jane Johnstone & Others — Additional Appendix, 10 Feb 1838