Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

RE-REVISED CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for JAMES MACALLAN, W.S. AND REVISED ANSWERS thereto for the TRUSTEES of Sir W. F. Eliott, Baronet. ADDITIONAL STATEMENT for the Claimant James

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimant seeks recovery of bond proceeds and estate rents from trustees, disputing their diligence and validity of post-inhibition conveyance.

RE-REVISED CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for William Bell, Writer to the Signet; AND REVISED ANSWERS thereto, for J. B. Yates and Mandatory, James Macallan, and Sir W. F. Eliott's Trust

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimant seeks preference on fund in medio for annuity arrears and expenses, asserting trust bond and prior decrees; trustees admit bond but deny full preference and debt amount.

Alexander and Robert Brodie v. Joseph Brooks Yates — 12 Nov 1836

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimants seek preferential status on fund in medio for annuity and principal sums owed under trust bonds, contested by defendants.

Alexander and Robert Brodie v. Joseph Brookes Yates and James Macallan — Reclaiming Petition, 14 Nov 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees of Sir W. F. Eliott seek to overturn a ruling that favored Joseph Brookes Yates and James Macallan over their claim on a £30,000 bond, asserting they are preferable claimants under the fund in medio.

Reclaiming Note, Trustees of Sir W. F. Eliott, Bart. against Lord Moncreiff's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Lord Ordinary rules that Eliott’s Trustees are preferred primo loco for annuity claims, while Yates and M’Allan are preferred pari passu over claims based on a bond for £30,000.

Bell's Executors v. Bell's Trustees — Opinion, 7 Feb 1835 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Court remits case to Guernsey bailiff for opinion on executor duties, then conjoins with multiplepoinding and holds raisers liable once; allows opinion and process to be seen; continues process for further claims.

Alexander Craig v. William Bell and Thomas Bell — Additional Appendix to Reclaiming Note, 22 Jan 1838

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimant Alexander Craig seeks recovery against executors of George Bell regarding consigned funds and legal duties under Guernsey law, with interlocutors addressing case preparation and opinion of Guernsey counsel.

Bell's Executors v. Bell's Trustees — Opinion, 7 Feb 1835

Abstract
AI-generated
Court remits case to Guernsey bailiff for opinion on executor duties regarding Scottish funds and interim distributions under Bell’s will.

Executors v. Trustees — Interlocutor, 22 Feb 1833

Abstract
AI-generated
Court orders consignment of disputed funds, defers legal opinion on executor duties, and extends deadlines for case preparation.

William Ramage v. William Bell and Thomas Bell — Additional Appendix to Reclaiming Note, 22 Jan 1838 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
William Ramage claims against William and Thomas Bell, executors of George Bell, in conjoined processes of multiplepoinding and exoneration involving multiple claimants and trustees.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 64
  • Page 65
  • Page 66
  • Page 67
  • Current page 68
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • Page 71
  • Page 72
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in