Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

James Grieve and Mandatory v. David Dow — Revised Condescendence and Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims guarantor liable for bill drawn after guarantee, despite lack of prior bill of lading; defender denies applicability and asserts executor authority.

James Grieve v. David Dow — Replies

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks decree against defender for debt arising from goods sold to deceased brother, challenging defenses of executor immunity and unstamped guarantee.

James Grieve v. David Dow — Bill of Advocation, 21 Aug 1838 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
James Grieve sues David Dow for £87.1.9d. owed under a guarantee letter, alleging Dow as executor is liable for unpaid bill despite condition requiring bill of lading and invoice.

James Grieve and William Middleton v. David Dow — Reclaiming Note, 6 Feb 1839

Abstract
AI-generated
Advocation seeking to uphold a guarantee despite lack of bill of lading, arguing actual delivery satisfied contractual terms.

Miss Elizabeth Dundas against Robert Dundas — Reclaiming Note, 1839

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders seek to reclaim an interlocutor and oppose heirs’ claims to marital provisions and estate attachment under statute 1685.

John Hamilton and Mandatory v. William Brown — Pleas in Law, 5 Dec 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender resists advocator’s claim to title-deeds, arguing bond security rights preclude early delivery until payment term, and seeks reimbursement of process expenses.

John Hamilton v. William Brown — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender challenges summary action for title-deeds delivery, arguing bond’s assignation is ‘during not redemption’ and interest obligation bars summary relief.

John Hamilton v. William Brown — Replies

Abstract
AI-generated
Replies by John Hamilton and Mandatory to the Answers for William Brown, Esquire, addressing dilatory defences and the necessity for production of title-deeds to support bond transfer.

Hamilton and Mandatory v. Brown — Bill of Advocation, 30 Nov 1837 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Complainers seek delivery of title deeds to inspect security for a bond due in 1838, against respondent’s refusal to produce them.

John Hamilton v. William Brown — Reclaiming Note, 15 Jan 1839

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaiming Note of John Hamilton and Alexander Hamilton, asking the Court to recal the interlocutor and find respondent liable for expenses incurred in the Sheriff-Court and this Court.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • Page 63
  • Current page 64
  • Page 65
  • Page 66
  • Page 67
  • Page 68
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in