AI-generated

Pursuers, proprietors of upper salmon-fishings on River Dee, seek removal of artificial obstructions (New Jargie Bank and jetties) constructed by defenders near river mouth, alleging unlawful encroachment that altered river flow and damaged upstream fisheries.

AI-generated

Petition of George Earl of Aberdeen and others, proprietors of the Raik Fishing on the River Dee, asking the Court to remit to a surveyor

AI-generated

Petition of Sir Robert Burnet of Leys Baronet and others, asking the Court to remit to Mr George Brown to protract and colour sections of the River Dee bed and adjacent grounds for adjudication.

AI-generated

Pursuers seek river Dee bank/dike survey to resolve encroachment, requesting renewed commission due to delays.

AI-generated

Pursuers claim suspension and interdict against defenders for obstructing salmon fishing by building dykes in the River Dee, alleging damage to their rights and profits.

AI-generated

Petition of Hugh Rose of Kilravock, asking the Court to repel the Reasons of Suspension and find the Letters orderly proceeded

AI-generated

Respondent defends against petition seeking suspension of decree for payment of twenty shillings for mussel-scalps, asserting prior possession and that mussels are not fructus naturalis of Old Bar under Petitioner’s tack.

AI-generated

Respondent seeks payment of a bond from Appellant, heir to debtor Earl of Rothes, challenging the validity of an entail that allegedly shields the heir from ancestral debts.

AI-generated

Appellant challenges the validity of a pre-1685 entail of the Rothes estate, asserting it was legally binding under common law and the 1662 Court of Session decision, and that the 1685 Tailzie Act does not retroactively require registration of prior entails.

AI-generated

Pursuer claims 5000 merks and interest from Earl of Rothes under a 1716 bond; defender asserts estate is entailed and thus immune from creditors under 1684 entail and 1687 charter.