AI-generated

Reclaiming Petition of Heritors of Bourtie, against Inner House Interlocutor, asking the Court to alter the augmentation granted to the minister

AI-generated

Dr Livingston answers petitioners' objections to his allocation of a parish augmentation, asserting his teind rights are valid and proportional to others, as affirmed in 1749.

AI-generated

Petition of Dr Alexander Hay of Meikle-Cocklaw and Others, Heritors of Peterhead, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

AI-generated

Sheriff-depute reports on augmentation dispute where heritors refuse to comply with court-ordered additional minute regarding stipend amount.

AI-generated

Petition of Lord Dundas and others, asking the Court to alter Lord Ankerville's interlocutor concerning the locality of teinds in the parish of Polmont.

AI-generated

Pursuer seeks approval of 1629 teind valuation for Lumphinnans, disputing defender’s claim that 1637 stipend constituted dereliction.

AI-generated

Memorial of Rev. Mr. Thomas Scott, arguing that the 1629 valuation of the teinds of Lumphinnans is derelict due to a sustained higher use of payment since 1637.

AI-generated

Respondent defends augmentation granted to minister of Clackmannan, asserting prior agreement with petitioner Mr Erskine of Marr and citing parish's large size, rental, industrial activity, and heritor concurrence as justification for stipend amount.

AI-generated

Respondent argues teinds were always drawn separately, making rent-based valuation unnecessary.

AI-generated

Memorial of the Reverend Mr. John Gillespie, arguing that the subvaluations for the parish of Arrochar have been derelinquished by payment of a greater sum than the valued teind, and by payment in money alone.