AI-generated

Petitioner seeks to compel the charger to re-execute English-form releases and bond of indemnity on proper stamps, and to deliver the original indenture, as required by an express obligation in a 1795 settlement, while challenging interlocutors that refused his claims.

AI-generated

Answers by Lewis Alexander Duff, Schoolmaster of Monymuik, to the objections made by Sir Archibald Grant, Baronet, regarding his removal from office and damages claimed.

AI-generated

Objec. Sir Archibald Grant, TO THE Acc. of Dam. L. Alex. Duff. Alex. Grant, W. S. Agent. M. Clk. OBJECTIONS FOR Sir Archibald Grant of Monymulk, Baronet, Defender ; TO THE ACCOUNT of Damages and Expences for Lewis Alexander Duff, Pursuer.

AI-generated

Schoolmaster Lewis Alexander Duff claims damages and expenses after being wrongfully removed from his parish schoolmaster post by Sir Archibald Grant, with the Court ordering an account of losses.

AI-generated

Petition of Sir Archibald Grant asking the Court to explain its interlocutor concerning the rights of the pursuer to a house formerly possessed by Theodore Leslie

AI-generated

Information of Sir Archibald Grant, Baronet, against Lewis Alexander Duff, arguing that the pursuer was admitted merely upon trial and not as a settled schoolmaster under the act 1696

AI-generated

Pursuer Lewis-Alexander Duff, schoolmaster of Monymuik since Whitsunday 1792, claims wrongful removal from office by defender Sir Archibald Grant in May 1795 without trial or cause, seeking reinstatement, damages, and solatium for reputational harm.

AI-generated

Objections by Sir Robert Burnett and others to an account of expenses submitted by Alexander Anderson and others, challenging the inclusion of costs not limited to proofs, plans, and answers as specified in the interlocutor of June 1798.

AI-generated

Defenders submitted account of expenses incurred in proofs, plans, and answers in declarator process against pursuers; Court ordered account to be presented and found pursuers liable for costs.

AI-generated

Respondents defend against petitioners' claim that their fishings were damaged by river deposits, asserting lawful adaptation of natural formations into fishing stations.