Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

James Heddle v. James Baikie — Reclaiming Note, 2 Dec 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Court rejects reduction plea over invalid citation, suspends letters, reduces decree, orders expense repayment, and sustains landlord’s defenses on lease claim.

James Baikie v. James Heddle — Reclaiming Petition, 2 Dec 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Court suspends removal, reduces decree, upholds landlord’s defenses, and awards modified expenses to pursuer.

James Heddle v. James Baikie — Reclaiming Petition, 2 Dec 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Court rejects tenant’s reduction plea over invalid citation, suspends letters, reduces decree, awards expenses, and sustains landlord’s defenses on lease term.

Edward Cruickshank and Others v. Patrick Rose — Reclaiming Note, 2 Dec 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Cruickshank et al. reclaim bond of caution against sheriff-clerk for Robert Shand’s non-appearance after protection expired, court finds obligation not limited by time and claim subsists.

Sir James Foulis v. George M'Whirter — Condescendence and Answers, 17 Mar 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer claims defender breached lease by raising damdyke, reducing tailrace for pursuer’s barley mill, causing injury; defender denies breach and asserts lease terms never required such height.

Reclaiming Note, George M'WHIRTER against Lord Cuninghame's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Lord Ordinary finds defender in breach of lease clause prohibiting damdyke height reducing Woodhall mill’s fall below 18 inches, despite prior construction and extended lease.

James King v. Patrick and William Creighton and George Creighton — Note, 1 Dec 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
James King sues Creighton tanners for £300 owed under a 1828 promissory note, contested via suspension proceedings and jury trial.

Additional Appendix for the Reclaimer, to Reclaiming Note, George Aitchison and Co. against Lord Jeffrey's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaimer George Aitchison & Co. submits additional appendix to reclaiming note against Lord Jeffrey's interlocutor, including financial ledger and correspondence regarding cargo, bills, and agent arrangements.

Petrie's Executors and Mandatories v. George Aitchison and Company — Summons, 4 Jun 1838

Abstract
AI-generated
Executors of deceased Captain Petrie sue merchants and partners for £1464.15.10 plus interest and costs under a will-probated in Chester.

James Petrie and Edmond Ward v. George Aitchison and Company — Reclaiming Note, 1 Dec 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders, merchants and partners, must pay £400 for unrenovated insurance on Captain Petrie’s effects after voyage route changed, minus premium; no misconduct proven; claim for personal expenses or speculation rejected.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 634
  • Page 635
  • Page 636
  • Page 637
  • Current page 638
  • Page 639
  • Page 640
  • Page 641
  • Page 642
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in