EUL0281 doc0011
Abstract
Plan showing layout of Nos 6 & 7 St Andrew Square, including shops, offices, and access to flats.
William Couper v. William Alexander — Reclaiming Petition, 18 Nov 1840
Abstract
Tenant seeks interdict against landlord’s new door linking printing office to common stair, alleging breach of lease and privacy.
David Balderston v. Bruce Richardson — Note of Appeal, 26 Nov 1840
Abstract
David Balderston appeals trustee’s rejection of his sequestration claim, arguing trustee improperly retained dividend based on disputed retention claim over furniture.
William Alexander v. William Couper — Reclaiming Note, 25 Nov 1840
Abstract
Reclaiming Note of William Alexander, Esq. Writer to the Signet, against William Couper, Boot and Shoemaker, asking the Court to alter the interlocutor and grant full expenses as prayed in the original petition.
Notes of Appeal, Alexander Ross and Others, in Sequestration James Christie and Company, and Others
Abstract
Appellants challenge Sheriff-Substitute’s election of James Westland as trustee, arguing personal disqualification and invalid votes, seeking confirmation of their own election.
Society of Advocates in Aberdeen v. Roderick Gray and Others — Answers, 7 Jan 1841
Abstract
Aberdeen Advocates oppose Peterhead writers’ petition for procurator admission, claiming it threatens their vested rights and financial interests.
Petition — Roderick Gray and Others for Authority to Admit them as Procurators
Abstract
Petition of Roderick Gray and others, asking the Court to remit the requirements of the act of sederunt of 11th July 1839, so that they may be admitted as procurators before the newly constituted sheriff-court in Peterhead.
Mansfield v. Stuart and Monypenny — 24 Nov 1840
Abstract
Lord Chancellor criticizes plaintiffs for improperly naming agents as defendants to secure costs, undermining equity and defendant’s right to present evidence.
William Baxter and Son, William Baxter and Edward Baxter v. George Aitchison and Company — Joint Minute, 18 Mar 1840
Abstract
Parties agree to settle without jury; pursuers seek judgment against George Aitchison and Company and two individual partners for costs and property claims.
Baxter and Son v. Aitchison and Co. — Appendix
Abstract
Baxter and Son sue Aitchison and Co. for unpaid consignment proceeds and disputed agency duties in Mauritius, backed by sales records, correspondence, and valuation docs.
