Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Christian Howden v. Francis Howden — Revised Condescendence and Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender admits prior marriage to deceased Mrs Isabella Grieve, dissolution by her death in 1809, and survival of six children including the pursuer.

John Howden v. Francis Howden — Summons, 31 May 1838

Abstract
AI-generated
John Howden sues his father Francis Howden for unpaid share of his mother’s estate, claiming £400 plus interest and £50 in costs.

George Aitchison and Company v. Petrie and Others, Petrie's Executors — Answers, 20 Jun 1838

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by George Aitchison and Company to the argument made by Petrie's executors, asserting the indefiniteness of the summons and challenging a £400 charge as unintelligible

The Burgh of Rutherglen v. The Trustees on the Bridges over the River Clyde at Glasgow — Summons, 7 Mar 1837

Abstract
AI-generated
Rutherglen Burgh and heritors sue Glasgow bridge trustees to remove a weir obstructing Clyde navigation upstream to Rutherglen.

The Magistrates of Rutherglen and Others, in the Conjoined Processes of Declarator and Removing at their Instance

Abstract
AI-generated
Court remits to engineers to survey river impacts of weir removal on water supply, bridge safety, and navigation rights.

James Lindsay Ewing v. John Crawford and James Crawford — Reclaiming Note, 30 Jun 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Landlord ordered to repair steading, fences, pay £44 plus interest and £15:17:2 inspection costs for breaching lease obligations.

Thomas Pollock v. John Macadam — Appendix to Reclaiming Note, 19 Feb 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Court orders case to be put to the Roll and permits respondent to print additional documents; parties agree to close record on revised pleadings.

James Gibson v. Andrew Rutherglen & Company — Reclaiming Note, 7 Dec 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks relief and repayment of a bill accepted for accommodation on a consignment to Canada, with defender bound to reimburse due to lack of proceeds and no personal liability established.

J. D. Hustler & Mandatory v. Allan & Watson — Reclaiming Petition, 7 Jan 1841

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaiming Petition of Allan & Watson, defending against Lord Jeffrey's interlocutor, asking the Court to recall and sustain their preliminary defences and assoilzie them from the summons

J. and W. Crum and Company v. Alexander Mein — Petition and Complaint, 7 Dec 1840

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners seek to rank as creditors against sequestrated estate of Ellis, Hutcheson and Company and partner George Baird for £250 debt, alleging continued liability after Baird’s admission as partner.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 631
  • Page 632
  • Page 633
  • Page 634
  • Current page 635
  • Page 636
  • Page 637
  • Page 638
  • Page 639
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in