Thomas Ker v. Alexander Wilson — Answers, 3 Mar 1769
Abstract
Answers by Alexander Wilson of Glanderston to the petition of Thomas Ker, responding to the claim that a bill of L. 150 Sterling is not a valid company-debt.
Thomas Ker v. Alexander Wilson — Answers, 9 Feb 1769
Abstract
Answers by Alexander Wilson of Glanderston to the petition of Thomas Ker, responding to the charge of collusion and asserting the bill's validity and the petitioner's lack of standing.
Reclaiming Petition — Archibald Ingram merchant, late provost of Glasgow, George Millar and Peter Bell merchants there in company
Abstract
Reclaiming Petition of Archibald Ingram, George Millar and Peter Bell, asking the Court to alter its interlocutor in favor of assignees under the commission of bankruptcy
Petition — William Gray merchant, and late Provost of Perth, and William Stewart junior merchant there
Abstract
Petitioners seek review of interlocutor finding them liable for lintseed purchased from Ogilvie, arguing fraud and collusion were wrongly assumed and they suffered damages from defective goods.
Petition — Andrew and Hugh Blackburns, merchants in Glasgow
Abstract
Petition of Andrew and Hugh Blackburns, merchants in Glasgow, asking the Court to remit the L. 195 : 0 : 9 neat proceeds of lintseed sold by Mr Ogilvy, and the interest and expenses incurred in defending the suit against Gray and Stewart.
John Brownlee v. Katharine Brownlee and Alexander Park — Answers, 15 Dec 1768
Abstract
Respondent Katharine Brownlee defends against her father’s petition to enforce marital contract provisions, arguing the decree is final and she is entitled to her inheritance without further litigation.
Petition — Thomas Wright of Easter-Glins [6]
Abstract
Petitioner seeks review of interlocutor rejecting reduction of settlement, arguing undue influence and witness suppression by pursuer.
John Ure v. Thomas Wright — Memorial, 20 Sep 1768 [2]
Abstract
Defender Thomas Wright seeks reduction of 1743 settlement favoring nephew James Ure, challenging validity on death-bed grounds and asserting rightful succession via sister’s line.
John Ure of Shirgarton v. Thomas Wright of Easter Glins — Memorial, 23 Sep 1768
Abstract
Memorial of John Ure of Shirgarton, arguing that a deathbed deed executed by his brother James Ure in March 1743 is valid and should not be reduced
John Ure v. Thomas Wright — State of the Process
Abstract
John Ure seeks reduction of a 1743 deed by James Ure, claiming it was executed on deathbed and invalid, while Thomas Wright defends possession gained via roup purchase in 1760.
