Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

William Little v. Sir William Jardine — Duplies, 31 May 1797

Abstract
AI-generated
William Little defends against Sir William Jardine’s claim that he secretly concealed £600 sterling, asserting his assets were transparently accounted for in creditor meetings and that Jardine’s objections to his financial statements are unfounded.

Representatives of Captain Matthew Stewart of Lochridge v. Thomas Gilmour — Answers, 30 May 1797

Abstract
AI-generated
Merchant Gilmour defends a £1.13.3d. debt owed by Captain Stewart’s sister, arguing it’s valid despite his later prescription and familial defense claims.

Sir Ralph Abercromby of Tillybody v. John Francis Erskine of Mar — Answers, 17 May 1797

Abstract
AI-generated
John Francis Erskine of Mar defends a decree of approbation against Sir Ralph Abercromby’s petition challenging valuation irregularity and dereliction of teind payment.

William Grant v. John Gordon — Answers, 17 May 1797

Abstract
AI-generated
Minister opposes heritor's moss deduction claim, calling it unjust and excessive, citing no tenant paid extra rent for peat and no other heritors made such claims.

James Robertson v. John Duke of Atholl — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Duke of Atholl defends contractual and arbitral rights to forest sheallings against James Robertson’s claim to expanded pasturage privileges.

John Clark v. Marion Kilpatrick — Answers, 25 Apr 1793

Abstract
AI-generated
Marion Kilpatrick, as grandchild of deceased testator, defends against John Clark’s claim, asserting res judicata and settlement terms bar payment until her majority.

John Clark v. Marion Kilpatrick — Answers, 6 Sep 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Marion Kilpatrick, Grand-daughter of the deceased James Kilpatrick, to the petition of John Clark, Saddler in Glasgow, responding to the argument that the legacy is payable before her majority.

Petition — John Clark against L. Dreghorn's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks reversal of Lord Dreghorn’s interlocutor denying legacy interest, claiming the 1776 judgment left interest undetermined and thus remains unaltered.

APPENDIX. List of Suspenders assessed, and Sums they Pay.

Abstract
AI-generated
Appendix listing suspenders and assessed sums paid by various tradesmen and laborers.

The Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow v. The Magistrates and Town Council of Glasgow — Information, 10 Dec 1793 [4]

Abstract
AI-generated
Magistrates and Town Council of Glasgow seek declarator against Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow over professional jurisdiction.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Current page 58
  • Page 59
  • Page 60
  • Page 61
  • Page 62
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in