Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

David Brown v. Walter Hunter — Information, 25 Jun 1795

Abstract
AI-generated
June 25, 1795 Information of the Reverend Mr David Brown, arguing that the vicarage teinds of Crailing were historically drawn in kind by his predecessors and should be restored to him.

Hog and Others v. Creditors of John Stewart &c — Petition, 21 Feb 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
February 21, 1792 Petition of James Hog, Cashier of the Paisley Banking Company, asking the Court to alter Lord Gardenston's interlocutor

W. Ferguson v. Hugh Mosman and John Anderson — Answers, 12 May 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
Hugh Mosman and John Anderson, common agents for Macfarlan creditors, answer William Ferguson’s petition challenging the sale of Arrochar lands, asserting teinds were exhausted and no deduction warranted.

Grinlay &c v. Lord Gardenstone's Interlocutor — Petition, 9 Mar 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
March 9, 1792: Petitioners seek court to revise interlocutor, arguing as bona fide purchasers at public sale, they’re not liable for furniture from Mrs. Campbell, and sheriff’s rent preference is improper.

Ferguson — Petition, 2 Mar 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks abatement of retained sum for unvalued teinds evicted post-sale of Arrochar estate, arguing equitable relief due to undisclosed burden.

Fergusson v. Mosman, et al

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Robert Graham and James Rowland v. Robert Dundas and William Richardson — Information, 17 Mar 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
March 17, 1792 Information of Robert Graham and James Rowland, arguing that the jury's verdict against them is unintelligible and therefore cannot support a sentence of condemnation

David Johnston and others v. Andrew Brown — Information, 12 May 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
May 12, 1796 Information of David Johnston of Lathrith, Esq; Captain Mungo Law of Pittillock, and others, arguing that the designation of temporal lands as glebe is invalid where kirk-lands exist in the parish.

George Graham of Kinross v. James Beatson of Mawbill and others — Memorial, 18 Jun 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
George Graham of Kinross, June 18, 1792, argues teind-duties are free and must first fund the minister’s stipend, as held by his family by feu-farm and confirmed by charter.

The Reverend Dr Andrew Brown v. David Johnston of Lathrik and others — Information, 12 May 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
May 12, 1796 Information of the Reverend Dr Andrew Brown, Minister of Falkland, arguing that the heritors cannot object to the glebe designation as it is out of temporal lands, given the kirk's relocation for their convenience.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 275
  • Page 276
  • Page 277
  • Page 278
  • Current page 279
  • Page 280
  • Page 281
  • Page 282
  • Page 283
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in