Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

William Wilson and Company v. John Scott — Proof, 3 Sep 1795

Abstract
AI-generated
September 3, 1795 Proof adduced for both parties in causa William Wilson and Company, manufacturers in Glasgow, pursuers; against John Scott, carrier betwixt Glasgow and Carlisle, defender.

William Wilson and Company v. John Scott — Information, 3 Jun 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
June 3, 1796 Information of William Wilson & Co., arguing that the defender John Scott is responsible for the safe delivery of goods to London within sixteen days

Douglas, Heron, & Company v. William Riddick — Petition, 25 Nov 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
William Riddick seeks court to alter Lord Dreghorn’s interlocutor in reclaiming petition vs. Douglas, Heron & Co., arguing bond falls under septennial limitation and decree lacks valid diligence.

Wilson and Company v. Carrier

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

William Gillespie and Company, and Taylor and Almond v. Thomas Milligain — Answers, 27 Feb 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
February 27, 1796 Answers by Thomas Milligain to the petition of William Gillespie and Company, arguing that he is a partner, not merely a servant, and that the petitioners' accusations are baseless and malicious.

Gillespie — Petition, 20 Feb 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
February 20, 1790 Petition of W. Gillespie and Co. &c. against Lord Stonefield's interlocutor, refusing a bill of advocation

Mrs Lydia Mariana Douglas v. Edward Ommaney, John Marr, John Page, and James Baillie of Culterallers — Information, 14 Apr 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
April 14, 1791 Information of Mrs Lydia Mariana Douglas, arguing that the condition in her father's will is void as capricious and unjust

Gillespie and Company v. Milligain

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

John Peter du Rouvray v. John Mackenzie — Information, 11 Oct 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
October 11, 1792 Information of John Peter du Rouvray and others, arguing that adjudications lacking intimation are void and null

Mackenzie v. Officers of State — Memorial, 2 Jan 1796

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 279
  • Page 280
  • Page 281
  • Page 282
  • Current page 283
  • Page 284
  • Page 285
  • Page 286
  • Page 287
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in