Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Magistrates and Town-Council of Paisley v. William M'Dowal, Esq. of Garthland and Others — Answers, 12 Apr 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
April 12, 1792 Answers by William M'Dowal, George Houston, Robert Fulton, Robert Corse, Boyd Porterfield, Boyd Alexander, Archibald Speirs, and assignees to the tolls, responding to the petition of the Magistrates and Town-Council of Paisley.

Bannerman v. Shaw and Ritchie

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Earl of Breadalbane v. Thomas Livingston — Answers, 7 Jan 1790

David Brown v. Walter Hunter — Answers, 2 Jan 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
January 2, 1796 Answers by Walter Hunter of Polmood, Esq; to the petition of the Reverend Mr David Brown, Minister of Crailing, responding to the claim for tithe of hay from sown grass.

Magistrates and Town-Council of Paisley v. M'Dowal et al — Petition, 1 Mar 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
March 1, 1792: Paisley magistrates petition to alter court interlocutor, seeking indemnity for road repairs claimed under 1753 turnpike act.

The Reverend David Brown v. Walter Hunter — Petition, 27 Nov 1795

Abstract
AI-generated
November 27, 1795 Petition of Rev. Mr David Brown, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Lamont v. Ewing — Petition, 25 May 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
May 25, 1792 Petition of Thomas Ewing asking the Court to overturn the interlocutor of the Lord Justice-Clerk, which found the water-bailie of Glasgow competent to hear a civil action for stolen goods.

David Brown v. Walter Hunter — Information, 1 Jul 1795

Abstract
AI-generated
July 1, 1795 Information of Walter Hunter, Esq; of Polmood, arguing that the action should be staid until his author Robert Scott of Trabrown is made a party

Earl of Breadalbane v. Thomas Livingston — Petition, 16 Dec 1789

Hog and Others v. Creditors of John Stewart &c — Answers, 26 Apr 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
April 26, 1792 Answers by the creditors of John Stewart and Company, responding to the petition of James Hog and others, that the bills in question were drawn after the dissolution of the copartnership in which the defenders were involved.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 274
  • Page 275
  • Page 276
  • Page 277
  • Current page 278
  • Page 279
  • Page 280
  • Page 281
  • Page 282
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in