Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Peter Walker v. Matthew Turnbull — Note of Advocation, 15 Jul 1841

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks judicial review of sheriff's interlocutors and orders sheriff to halt proceedings in lease dispute over shared steam power and machinery.

Peter Walker v. Matthew Turnbull — Reclaiming Note, 14 Feb 1843

Abstract
AI-generated
Advocator seeks to reclaim an interlocutor against respondent, arguing the contractual arrangement was misunderstood and the parties' prior conduct contradicts the respondent's claim.

George Provand v. James Provand — Minute, 1843

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuer seeks to produce titles under a hypothec reservation, court grants conditional production with redelivery rights.

George Provand v. James Provand and Others — Interlocutor, 7 Mar 1843 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Lord Ordinary orders printing of notary's minute for title production under hypothec, with reservation of return rights.

Robert Graham v. William Graham Watt — Appendix, 7 Mar 1843 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender’s appendix advises on estate valuation and land sale priorities under 28-year purchase rule, noting debts and legacy obligations.

James, Viscount Strathallan, and Others v. Fletcher, Lord Grantley — Minute, 18 Jan 1843

Abstract
AI-generated
George Duncan Robertson, son of deceased General Robertson, substituted as pursuer to claim declaratory relief and damages on behalf of his estate under entailment.

Colonel Robertson's Trustees v. Lord Grantley — Revised Case, 11 Jan 1843 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees of deceased Lieutenant-Colonel Robertson seek declarator against Lord Grantley regarding property rights.

James, Viscount Strathallan, Robert Whigham, William Smythe, James Robertson and George Duncan Robertson v. Fletcher, Lord Grantley — Reclaiming Note, 14 Feb 1843

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers assert redemption rights over restored forfeited estates, disputing defender’s claim that redemption is limited to original grantees.

James, Viscount Strathallan, Robert Whigham, William Smythe and James Robertson v. Fletcher, Lord Grantley — Reclaiming Note, 4 Mar 1843

Abstract
AI-generated
Court sustains pursuers' right to redeem heritable property under charter, reserves valuation and ejectment for later, awards expenses.

David Hunter v. Thomas Thomson — Reclaiming Note

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender seeks absolution from action over unpaid bill for horse purchase and professional account, challenging pursuer’s claim and asserting debt was paid or settled.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 251
  • Page 252
  • Page 253
  • Page 254
  • Current page 255
  • Page 256
  • Page 257
  • Page 258
  • Page 259
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in