Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

REVISED CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for ELIZABETH or BETSEY ALLAN or HALLEY, Spouse of DAVID HALLEY, sometime Distiller in Crieff, now residing there, with consent and concurrence of

Abstract
AI-generated
Mrs Halley claims liferent over sequestrated estate, challenging trustees’ management and asserting rights to trust assets and bank accounts.

Andrew M'Robbie and John Gowans v. James Adam, David Halley and his Wife — Condescendence, 2 Feb 1843

Abstract
AI-generated
Claimants assert ownership of a bank fund via trust-conveyance, while defendants deny competing claims and assert arrestments bar their rights.

James Adam and Elizabeth or Betsy Allan or Halley v. Andrew M'Robbie and John Gowans — Reclaiming Note

Abstract
AI-generated
Adam and Allan/Halley seek priority in fund held by trustee post-sequestration composition against M’Robbie and Gowans.

Davidson v. Hill; Douglas v. Hill — Summons, 30 Nov 1842

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim defender owes unpaid interest and costs from a 1827 trust settlement, citing failure to pay since Whitsunday 1841.

RECLAIMING NOTE FOR Mrs ELIZABETH HILL, or DAVIDSON, Spouse of Charles Forbes Davidson, W.S., and Mrs MARGARET LAWSON HILL, or DOUGLAS, Spouse of David Douglas, W.S., and the said

Abstract
AI-generated
Reclaiming Petition of Charles Forbes Davidson and David Douglas, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor and assoilzie them from conclusions against them, and to decern in terms of conclusions against Charles Hill.

Kenneth M'Lennan v. Dewar and Orr — Note, 20 Dec 1842

Abstract
AI-generated
Note for the Suspender in the suspension at the instance of Kenneth M‘Lennan, Merchant, Plocktown, Lochalsh, against Dewar and Orr, Warehousemen in Glasgow, requesting the Lord Ordinary to allow additional time to lodge answers.

Kenneth M'Lennan v. Dewar and Orr — Note

Abstract
AI-generated
Note of Suspension by Kenneth M'LeNNAN, Merchant, Plocktown, Lochalsh, against Dewar and Orr, Warehousemen in Glasgow, challenging the legality of a charge based on a blank bill stamp.

Dewar and Orr v. Kenneth M'Lennan — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents admit facts of trade dealings and dishonored bills but deny validity of suspension note and assert new charge is lawful and well-founded.

Kenneth M'Lennan v. Dewar and Orr — Bill of Suspension, 20 Oct 1842

Abstract
AI-generated
Complainer seeks suspension of charge for £87.1.9 and interest, alleging invalid use of blank bill stamp and pending prior suspension.

4.—STATEMENT of FACTS by the Petitioner, ANSWERS thereto by Respondent, and REPLIES thereto by Petitioner.

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner claims respondent unlawfully uses unleased machinery, demands repair costs, and asserts exclusive rights to shafting.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 250
  • Page 251
  • Page 252
  • Page 253
  • Current page 254
  • Page 255
  • Page 256
  • Page 257
  • Page 258
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in