Spencer Sutherland and Company v. John Hay — Pleas in Law, 1842
Abstract
Defenders deny lease validity on grounds of informality, but court rejects preliminary defences and conjoins actions over quarry rent.
John Hay of Letham v. Spencer Sutherland and Company and Spencer Sutherland and James Forbes — Replies, 21 May 1841
Abstract
Replies for John Hay, Esquire of Letham, Pursuer; to the Defences for Spencer Sutherland and Company, Harbour Contractors in Arbroath, and for Spencer Sutherland and James Forbes, the individual Partners of that Company,—Defenders.
John Hay of Letham v. Spencer Sutherland and Company, Harbour Contractors in Arbroath, and Spencer Sutherland and James Forbes — State of the Process, 9 Dec 1841
Abstract
State of the Process for John Hay, Esquire of Letham, Pursuer; to the Defences for Spencer Sutherland and Company, Harbour Contractors in Arbroath, and for Spencer Sutherland and James Forbes, the individual Partners of that Company, Defenders.
John Hay v. Spencer Sutherland and Company, Spencer Sutherland and James Forbes — Replies
Abstract
Defenders challenge action on grounds of defective summons, unstamped document, non-binding lease proposal, and lack of homologation.
The Reverend John Paton v. The Right Honourable Thomas Earl of Zetland — Reclaiming Note, 1 Mar 1843
Abstract
Reclaiming note challenging suspension and interdict against a minister, seeking to reinstate proceedings and recover expenses.
The Earl of Rosslyn and Others v. The Trustees of the Earl of Strathmore — Report, 2 Dec 1842
Abstract
Pursuers seek repayment of stipend over 40 merks Scots from defenders, citing land rights and augmentations, with accountant’s report detailing owed sums to heirs and trustees.
Earl of Rosslyn and Others v. The Trustees of the late Earl of Strathmore — Reclaiming Petition, 18 Mar 1843
Abstract
Pursuers seek payment for stipend over 40 merks Scots on Grange, Banchrie, Half Lands of Tyrie, plus interest and expenses, under a 1632 contract.
STATEMENT of FACTS for Defender, and ANSWERS thereto for Pursuers.
Abstract
Defender seeks to reduce jury verdict confirming his heirship to Archibald M'Lean, contested by Crown as ultima heres.
Alexander M'Lean v. Her Majesty's Officers of State for Scotland — Reclaiming Note, 11 Jul 1839
Abstract
Reclaiming Note of Alexander M'Lean, defending against Her Majesty's Officers of State, asking the Court to recall and alter the interlocutor complained of
John Harvey v. William Muir — Reclaiming Note, 7 Mar 1843
Abstract
Defender seeks to have debt extinguished via compensation plea, court to review whether other pleas are valid and decide on costs.
