Lieutenant Alexander Gods-man v. Colonel Norman Macleod, Arthur Forbes of Culloden, and others — Answers, 30 Jun 1791
Abstract
June 30, 1791 Answers by Colonel Norman Macleod, Arthur Forbes of Culloden, and others, to the petition of Lieutenant Alexander Godsman, arguing that the objection of nominality may be established at common law by every mode of investigation.
Lord William Gordon v. Colonel Norman Macleod — Answers, 24 Feb 1791
Abstract
February 24, 1791 Answers by Colonel Norman Macleod, Arthur Forbes, Esq; of Culloden, and others, to the petition and complaint of Lord William Gordon, Vice-Admiral of Scotland, asserting that the four-month limitation does not bar striking off nominal and fictitious voters.
Gordon v. M'Leod — Petitionand Complaint, 3 Feb 1791
Abstract
Lord W. Gordon petitions to restore his name to Inverness-shire freeholders' roll, challenging Colonel M'Leod’s illegal expungement without formal objection.
Archibald Forbes v. Magistrates of the Canongate — Answers, 24 May 1791
Abstract
May 24, 1791 Answers by the Magistrates of Canongate to the petition of Archibald Forbes, arguing that the Magistrates did not breach the act of federunt, as the prisoner's health was sufficiently established by certificates on soul and conscience.
