Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Archibald and James Robertson v. John Laird — Petition, 1 Jul 1790

Munro v. Sinclair and Horne

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Baird v. Thomson — Answers, 22 Dec 1796

Donald Macdonald of Ballifhare v. Captain Neil Macarthur — Memorial, 20 Dec 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
December 20, 1791 Memorial of D. Macdonald, arguing that as executor qua nearest of kin he holds a clear right to recover the balance of a debt due from Captain Neil Macarthur.

William Maxwell Morison

Name
William Maxwell Morrison
Occupation
Advocate
Biographical Info
Oxford DNB
Biographical Notes
Advocate, 20 July 1784. Son of James Morison; m. Sibella Stephan; Sheriff-Substitute Clackmannan 1787; Collector of Decisions; Remembered for monumental dictionary if decision of the court of session.
Connections
  • Read more about William Maxwell Morison
Life Dates
- 1821

John Laird and Company v. Walter Grindlay — Answers, 14 Apr 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
April 14, 1791 Answers by Walter Grindlay, Farmer at Seabegs, and John Buchanan, Merchant in Greenock, his Mandatory, to the petition of John Laird and Company, Merchants in Greenock, responding to the claim that the defenders unlawfully possess the mills.

Baird v. Thomson — Petition, 25 Nov 1796

Baird v. Thomson

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Miss Mary, Helen, and Isabella Stewarts v. Sir John Scott of Ancrum, Baronet, Mr Thomas Campbell, Minister of Ancrum, Charles M'Kenzie, Writer in Edinburgh, and Mr William Brown, Minister of Bedrule — Memorial, 26 Jan 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
January 26, 1796 Memorial of Miss Mary, Helen, and Isabella Stewarts of Barnhills, arguing that they are entitled to a conveyance of the teinds on payment of six years purchase, as the defender has no right to them unless as patron under the act 1690.

Sir John Scott of Ancrum v. Miss Mary, &c. Stewarts of Barnhills — Memorial, 15 Nov 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
November 15, 1796 Memorial of the defender, arguing that his charters convey an heritable right to the teinds of Ancrum, not merely patronage.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 942
  • Page 943
  • Page 944
  • Page 945
  • Current page 946
  • Page 947
  • Page 948
  • Page 949
  • Page 950
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in