Earl of Rednor v. Macarthur — Petition, 18 Jan 1791
Abstract
January 18, 1791 Petition of Archibald Macarthur Stewart asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
Miss Elizabeth Wilkins v. William Campbell — Information, 6 Jun 1798
Abstract
June 6, 1798 Information of William Campbell of Fairfield, Esq; Sheriff-Clerk of the County of Ayr, arguing that he is not liable for a debt owed by Edmund Kelly, on grounds of irregular bail procedures and absence of malversation.
Creditors of John Horn — Petition, 8 Mar 1791
Abstract
George Wilson, trustee, petitions March 8, 1791, to alter an interlocutor allowing individual creditors to adjudicate post-sequestration, citing statutory prohibition and risk of confusion or penalty preference.
Lady Christian Graham v. Catharine Pate, John Dickson and Robert Dickson — Answers, 12 Dec 1798
Abstract
December 12, 1798 Answers by Lady Christian Graham, Executrix, and her Commissioner and Factor, to the petition of Catharine Pate and others, responding to the argument that bygone teinds are cut off by quinquennial prescription
Pate — Petition, 14 Nov 1798
Abstract
November 14, 1798 Petition of Catharine Pate, John Dickson, and Robert Dickson against Lord Swinton's interlocutor
Alexander Chrystie v. William Ferguson — Answers, 13 Jan 1789
Abstract
Respondents defend 1789 Burntisland election against complaint seeking voidance or partial relief, arguing majority votes remained valid despite bribery allegations.
The Deans of the Chapel Royal and their Lessees v. Hay and Others, Heritors of the Parish of Ettrick — Addl Petition, 21 Apr 1796
Abstract
April 21, 1796 Petition of the Duke of Buccleuch, J. E. Anderson of Tushielaw, and the Rev. Doctors Henry Grieve, Alexander Carlyle, and Joseph M'Cormick, asking the Court to alter its interlocutor in the locality of Ettrick.
William Ferguson v. William Muir and James Davidson — Memorial, 11 May 1791
Abstract
May 11, 1791 Memorial of William Ferguson, Esq; of Raith, Provost, and the other Magistrates and Counsellors of the Borough of Burntisland, arguing that the election of William Muir and James Davidson as counsellors was void due to non-residence and foreign status.
William Muir and James Durie v. William Ferguson — Duplies, 22 Feb 1791
Abstract
Feb 22, 1791: Duplies from Burntisland magistrates/counselors replying to William Muir and James Durie.
William Muir and James Davidson v. William Fergusson and others — Answers, 24 Dec 1790
Abstract
December 24, 1790 Answers by William Fergusson, Esq; of Raith, Provost, and the other Magistrates and Counsellors of the Burgh of Burntisland, responding to the petition and complaint of William Muir and James Davidson.
