Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

David Simpson v. Thomas Tod — Duplies, 21 Jan 1790

James Lindsay and Company v. George Jones — Information, 2 Feb 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
February 2, 1796 Information of James Lindsay and Company, Wood-merchants in Glasgow, arguing that the suspender's proceedings were irregular and incompetent

Lindsay and Company v. Jones

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Lieutenant James Fyfe v. Patrick Duff of Carnousie — Information, 20 Jan 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
January 20, 1796 Information of defenders, arguing that a liferent superiority is a true and real estate in law, and therefore not nominal or fictitious for parliamentary voting purposes.

James M'Calmond v. Hugh-Gavin Park — Answers, 14 Jun 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
June 14, 1792 Answers by Hugh-Gavin Park, Tacksman of the Lands of Camregan, to the petition of James M'Calmond, arguing that an unstamped obligation is not valid in law or equity

David Simpson v. Thomas Tod — Replies, 7 Jan 1790

Patrick Duff v. James Fyfe — Information, 14 May 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
May 14, 1796 Information of Patrick Duff of Carnousie, Esq, with concourse of his Majesty's Advocate, arguing that Lieutenant James Fyfe committed perjury by falsely swearing to a nominal and fictitious freehold qualification.

M'Calmond v. Park — Petition, 26 May 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
May 26, 1792 Petition of James M'Calmond asking the Court to alter Lord Stonefield's interlocutor refusing his bill of advocation

Duff v. Fyfe

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

David Turnbull v. James Rankines, John Rankines and John Black — Answers, 2 Jan 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
David Turnbull, baker, sues James & John Rankines and master John Black for 1793 biscuit loss due to improper stowage and negligent navigation.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 927
  • Page 928
  • Page 929
  • Page 930
  • Current page 931
  • Page 932
  • Page 933
  • Page 934
  • Page 935
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in