Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Home v. Purchasers of Renton

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

The Bakers of Glasgow v. M'Leod and the Magistrates of Glasgow — Minutes, 17 Feb 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
February 17, 1792 State of the Process of the Bakers of Glasgow against M'Leod and the Magistrates of Glasgow, reporting on remits from the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor

Incorporation of Bakers in Glasgow and John M'Fait and others v. Malcolm M'Leod — Answers, 25 Jun 1789

Abstract
AI-generated
June 25, 1789 Answers by Malcolm M'Leod, tackman of the ladle-dues, to the petition of the Incorporation of Bakers in Glasgow, responding to their claim of immunity from payment.

Sir William Forbes and Others v. Andrew Gordon — Interrogatories, 25 May 1790

Incorporation of Bakers in Glasgow v. Malcolm M'Leod — Appendix, 4 Aug 1789

Abstract
AI-generated
August 4, 1789 Appendix to Answers for Malcolm M'Leod; to the Petition of the Incorporation of Bakers in Glasgow, containing a copy of the 1693 submission and decree-arbitral in the dispute between the Town and the Bakers.

Reverend Mr William Forfar v. James Oliphant of Over Kinnedder — Answers, 28 Jun 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
June 28, 1796 Answers by James Oliphant of Over Kinnedder to the petition of the Reverend Mr William Forfar, Minister of Saline, responding to the claim for white oats in lieu of gray horse corn.

Malcolm Macleod v. John Macfeat — Proof, 20 Dec 1784

Abstract
AI-generated
Dec 20, 1784: Pursuer proves ladle-dues applied to all wheat/flour entering Glasgow, including that ground at Partick mills.

Forfar v. Oliphant

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Francis Cunningham v. Sir John Whitefoord — Answers, 1 Jul 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
July 1, 1796 Answers by Sir John Whitefoord of Whitefoord, Baronet, to the petition of Francis Cunningham, Esquire, arguing that the petitioner has no legal claim to the estate and that sequestration is inappropriate given the respondent's lawful possession and feudal titles.

M'Leod v. Incorporation of Bakers — Petition, 16 Jan 1789

Abstract
AI-generated
January 16, 1789 Petition of the Incorporation of Bakers in Glasgow, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 923
  • Page 924
  • Page 925
  • Page 926
  • Current page 927
  • Page 928
  • Page 929
  • Page 930
  • Page 931
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in