Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

James Lindsay Carnegie v. Charles Gardyne — Answers, 2 Feb 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
February 2, 1796 Answers by Charles Gardyne, Esq. to the petition and complaint of James Lindsay Carnegie, Esq., asserting that his claim for enrolment satisfied the statute of the 16th of the late King.

James Lindsay Carnegy v. Charles Gardyne — Petitionand Complaint, 12 Jan 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
January 12, 1796 Petition and Complaint of James Lindsay Carnegy, Esq. asking the Court to overturn the enrolment of Charles Gardyne, Esq. at the Michaelmas head-court for Forfar

David Simpson v. Thomas Tod

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Rev. Mr. Bannerman v. David Shaw — Answers, 7 Apr 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
April 7, 1796 Answers by David Shaw and Alex Ritchie to the petition of Rev. Mr. James Bannerman, responding to the claim for a bond due from his late uncle Patrick Bannerman.

Bannerman v. Shaw and Ritchie — Petition, 17 Feb 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
February 17, 1796 Petition of the Rev. Mr. James Bannerman, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor and assoilzie him

Earl of Breadalbane v. Thomas Livingston — Manuscript, 16 Jun 1790

David Shaw v. James Bannerman — Answers, 2 Jan 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
January 2, 1796 Answers by David Shaw of Jamaica and Alexander Ritchie, his attorney, to the petition of Rev. Mr James Bannerman, executor of Mrs Beatrix Goldie, responding to claims under a bond dated 1771.

Bannerman v. Shaw and Ritchie — Petition, 30 Jun 1795

Abstract
AI-generated
June 30, 1795 Petition of the Rev. Mr. James Bannerman asking the Court to overturn the interlocutor ordering him to condescend on the bond granted by his late husband

Magistrates and Town-Council of Paisley v. William M'Dowal, Esq. of Garthland and Others — Answers, 12 Apr 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
April 12, 1792 Answers by William M'Dowal, George Houston, Robert Fulton, Robert Corse, Boyd Porterfield, Boyd Alexander, Archibald Speirs, and assignees to the tolls, responding to the petition of the Magistrates and Town-Council of Paisley.

Bannerman v. Shaw and Ritchie

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 929
  • Page 930
  • Page 931
  • Page 932
  • Current page 933
  • Page 934
  • Page 935
  • Page 936
  • Page 937
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in