Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Sir Alexander Purves v. John Home — Duplies, 31 May 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
May 31, 1796 Duplies for Sir Alexander Purves, as Administrator in Law for his children, arguing that the respondents' conduct in managing the Renton estate was injurious to the heirs of entail.

Home v. Purchasers of Renton — Replies, 7 Apr 1796

John Ritchie v. Sir George Home — Replies, 1 Jul 1790

John Home v. Sir Alexander Purves — Replies, 7 Apr 1796

Abstract
AI-generated
April 7, 1796 Replies by John Home, Writer to the Signet, Curator bonis on the Estate of Renton, to the Answers for Sir Alexander Purves.

Home v. Purchasers of Renton — Answers, 25 Feb 1796

John Ritchie v. Sir George Home — Answers, 24 Jun 1790

Muirhead, Hay and Company v. Robert Dunmore — Information, 12 Jun 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
June 12, 1792 Information of Robert Dunmore, Defender, arguing that the debts claimed are prescribed, unsupported by original grounds, and improperly pursued after forfeiture in Virginia

Sir John Stirling v. George Johnston and James Home — Answers, 17 Dec 1795

Abstract
AI-generated
December 17, 1795 Answers by George Johnston to the petition of Sir John Stirling, asserting that the entail of Renton lands was valid and that the petitioner’s claims to disincumber the estate are without legal foundation.

Thomas Johnston, of Templehall

Name
Thomas Johnston, of Templehall
Occupation
Advocate
Biographical Notes
Advocate, 24 June 1794. Son of Thomas Johnston; m. Joan.
Connections
  • Read more about Thomas Johnston, of Templehall
Life Dates
1773 - 1841

Muirheid, Hay, and Company v. Robert Dunmore — Information, 2 Jun 1792

Abstract
AI-generated
June 2, 1792 Information of Mess. MUIRHEID, HAY, and Company, Merchants in Glasgow, arguing that Robert Dunmore, as a partner of Logan, Gilmour, and Company, is liable for debts contracted in Virginia.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 921
  • Page 922
  • Page 923
  • Page 924
  • Current page 925
  • Page 926
  • Page 927
  • Page 928
  • Page 929
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in