A power of attorney. Mandatory, one holding a mandate. Mandant, one granting a mandate.
Definition source
Kinnear, J. B., Digest of House of Lords Cases Decided on Appeal from Scotland, 1709-1864 — Glossary of Scottish Law Terms (Edinburgh, 1865). Public domain.
Legal Subject: Mandate |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Mudie v. John Ouchterlony | 1766 | Mandate, Debt, Rent, Lease, Arrestment, Proof | Pursuer Alexander Mudie claimed that Alexander Ouchterlony had verbally commissioned him to purchase a tenement in Arbroath without disclosing that Oucterlony was his principal. Mudie was sued in connection with the deal and, in turn, raised an action against Ouchterlony; however, Ouchterlony died while the litigation was pending. Mudie then renewed the process against Ouchterlony’s representatives. They denied any knowledge of the commission and argued that it could only be proved by a writing. |
| Davidson v. Elphinstone | 1802 | Mandate, Freeholder, Property rights, Title (detour), Landlord, Retour | Robert Hill, as the agent of the Honourable Charles Elphinstone, Captain of the Royal Navy, claimed property rights of Eastern Glenboig, otherwise known as Endboig, with the mill, mill-lands, and other land (County of Stirling). The Title-deeds (Detour) and other records related to the case were submitted in order to support the enrollment of C. Elphinstone. Harry Davidson objected, first that the titles were not legal evidence of the old extend, and second, that Hill was not entitled to act in name and on behalf of H. Charles Elphinstone, because he was out of the Kingdom and there was no special mandate granted to Hill for such purposes. Taking into consideration the objections, the Lords sustained that H. Charles Elphinstone could not be enrolled as a freeholder (landlord) of the Glenboig. |
| James Stewart v. Alexander Scot | 1830 | Cautioner, Factor, Creditor, Intromission, Aliment, Mandate | James Stewart, as pursuer, submitted a revised case against Alexander Scot, the defender. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Samuel Cole, &c v. Ephraim Flamare, &c | 1772 | Debt, Bankruptcy, Arrestment, Sequestration, Statute, Mandate | Samuel Cole, pursuer, was a silk-weaver based in London. Some of his silk (worth £3,000 Sterling) was stored in a warehouse in Canongate, a district of Edinburgh. Cole declared bankruptcy. Shortly after this, Flammare, defender and creditor of Cole, went to Edinburgh to seize Cole's silk in Canongate by using an admiral-precept. William Cole, brother and creditor of Samuel Cole, along with other creditors of Samuel Cole, also took out an admiral-precept on Samuel Cole's effects in Edinburgh. These other creditors sought an equal distribution of Cole's property among the creditors. Flammare alleged, among other procedural defects, that the other creditors' application for sequestration was ineffective under the applicable bankruptcy statute because the case involved an English, not Scottish, debtor. |
| Stewart V. Ireland | 1796 | Conveyance, Disposition, Mandate, Diligence, Freeholder, Election contest | Charles Stewart petitioned to overturn the freeholders' refusal to enroll him on the roll of freeholders, resting his claim upon titles and a valuation certificate, and William Ireland answered that the qualification was nominal and fictitious and that no mandate had been produced. The parties exchanged replies and duplies disputing the validity of the claim and seeking commission to recover material writings, after which Ireland petitioned against an Inner-House interlocutor that had found the freeholders erred in refusing admission. Stewart subsequently moved the court to apply a recent judgment of the House of Peers and to modify the account of expenses. |
| The Interim Factor on the Sequestrated Estate of Bertram, Gardner & Co v. David Thomson | 1794 | Debt, Bankruptcy, Hypothec, Sequestration, Mandate, Election contest | Richard Hotchkis, as interim factor on the sequestrated estate of Bertram, Gardner & Co, petitioned the Court to ordain David Thomson to deliver up all writings in his possession belonging to the bankrupts, with reservation of Thomson's hypothec. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
Documents discussing this subject (showing 100 of 117)
- Alex. Ewing v. George Brown — Answers
- Alexander Abercromby v. Adam Thomson — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Alexander Izat v. Marshall & Hutchison — Answers, 1 Feb 1809
- Alexander Young, Alexander Milne, George Gordon and others v. Donald Calder — Answers, 15 Jul 1784
- Andrew Gairdner v. John M'Goun — Duplies, 4 Jul 1821
- Andrew Harvie v. George Wink — Appendix, 2 Jul 1847 [2]
- Andrew Millar v. James Gibson-Craig, Esq. of Riccarton, and Others — Note, 1 Dec 1826
- ANS.—GILBERT SANDERS, TO THE PET. & COMP.—C. S. MIDDLETON, Esq. and Mandatory. ANSWERS FOR GILBERT SANDERS, Accountant in Glasgow, Trustee on the Sequestrated Estate of ROBERT WILS
- Appeal for David Duff, Trustee duly elected by a majority of Creditors in value, and claiming to be Trustee on the Sequestrated Estates of Archibald Menzies, Hotel-Keeper, Aberfeldy, and for Robert Kennedy, Distiller, Ballechin; Robert Grant, Hotel-K
- Appeal, David Duff and Others, in Sequestration of the Estates of Archibald Menzies. Notes and Deliverance by the Sheriff-Substitute in the Competition for the office of Trustee on the Estate of Archibald Menzies, Aberfeldy. on Notes of Objections fo
- Appendix to Note of Appeal for David Duff, & Others, in Sequestration of Archibald Menzies
- APPENDIX.
- APPENDIX. Dr.—Mr ALEXANDER IZATT, and Owners of the Diligence, Captain Hurst, in Account Current with SAMUEL MARSHALL and HUTCHISON,—Crs.
- APPENDIX. INVENTORY of Writings of the Estate of Cattleshiel and Durrington, belonging to John Trotter of Horseheath and Cattleshiel, &c. Esq. which were found in the repositories
- Browns & Mandatory v. Watson & Darg — Summons, 10 Jun 1820
- Captain Robert Christie v. Adam Thomson and others — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Charles Elphinstone v. Harry Davidson — Answers, 30 Jun 1802
- Charles Stewart v. William Ireland — Answers, 6 Dec 1796
- Charles Stewart v. William Ireland — Replies, 7 Jan 1797
- Competition Among the Creditors of Macfarlane — Petition, 19 Nov 1766
- David Miller v. Henry Belfrage — Information, 4 Jul 1763
- David Paterson v. John Pollock — Duplies, 21 Feb 1811 [2]
- David Turnbull v. James Rankines, John Rankines and John Black — Answers, 2 Jan 1796
- DEFENDER'S STATEMENT OF FACTS and Pursuers' ANSWERS THERETO.
- Donald Ross and Catharine Ross v. Sir William Forbes, James Hunter, and Company — Answers, 20 Feb 1792
- Dr David Johnston and Thomas Gladstone v. Robert Menzies, Robert Liddel, Archibald Cleghorn, and John Glover — Answers, 1807
- Eden, Ridley, and Company v. Threipland, et al — Petition, 24 Jan 1794
- Edinburgh, 6th March 1835.—The Lord Ordinary prorogates the time for lodging the Answers till the first box-day in the vacation, and appoints Revised Condescendence and Pleas to be
- Edward Railton v. Alexander Gray — Note, 14 May 1834
- George Sinclair and Others v. James Anderson — Answers, 15 Dec 1819
- Harry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — 15 May 1802
- Harry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — Answers, 11 Feb 1802
- Harry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — Replies, 3 Mar 1802
- Hotchkis — Petition, 13 Jan 1794
- J. T. & A. Douglas & Co. and others v. William Jeffrey — Answers, 4 Jan 1821
- James Baikie v. James Stewart — Rev, 20 Jan 1832
- James Hamilton, Senior v. Robert Hunter and Company — Answers, 31 Jul 1782
- James Morgan v. Viscount of Arbuthnot — Replies, 14 Jun 1791 [2]
- James Richmond and Company v. Hugh Railton and William Lyon M'Phun — Reclaiming Note, 24 Apr 1850
- James Stewart v. Alexander Scot — Revised, 27 Jan 1832
- James Sword, Alexander Drysdale and Others v. Duncan Kennedy — Replies, 9 Jul 1819
- John Bailie v. James Watson — Petition and Complaint, 11 Sep 1821
- John Cowan v. Agnes Watt and Peter Campbell — Reasons, 6 Feb 1830
- John Cowan v. Peter Campbell — Reclaiming Note, 11 Jan 1831
- John Hannay v. Adam Thomson, Esq. of Muncraig, and others, Freeholders of the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- John M'Goun v. Andrew Gairdner — Replies, 25 Jun 1821
- John Mitchell v. David Cable — Answers, 21 Jan 1846
- John Pollock v. David Paterson — Answers, 9 Jan 1811 [2]
- John Pollock v. David Paterson — Replies, 1 Feb 1811
- John Rutherfoord v. William Somerville — Memorial, 21 Apr 1814
- John Walker v. John Anderson Junior — Reclaiming Note, 3 Jan 1829
- Joseph Bushby v. Adam Thomson — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Laird v. Grindlay — Petition, 17 Feb 1791
- LC Volume 03 — Information, 27 Nov 1811 [2]
- LC Volume 04 — Petition, 3 Jul 1815
- LC Volume 04 — Reclaiming Petition, 9 Sep 1813 [2]
- LC Volume 06 — Petition, 27 Jun 1821 [2]
- LC Volume 07 — Petition, 26 Jan 1837 [2]
- Lewis-Alexander Duff v. Sir Archibald Grant — Information, 21 Dec 1798
- Lieutenant Colonel James Stewart of Lochins v. Adam Thomson, Esq. of Muncraig, and others — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Lord William Gordon v. Colonel Norman M'Leod — Replies, 14 Apr 1791 [2]
- M'Donald and M'Nab v. William Jaffray, Junior — Answers, 25 May 1824
- Macdonald and Others v. William Jaffray, Jun. — Petition and Complaint, 12 May 1824
- Major John Ross v. Adam Thomson — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Mark Sproat v. Adam Thomson, Esq. of Muncraig, and others — Answers, 2 Mar 1791
- Mary Grieve v. James Yorkston, Barbara Douglas, and Elspeth Libertone — Answers, 25 Jun 1794
- Mess. Dunlop and Montgomery v. Walter Peter — answers, 28 Jul 1781
- MINUTES of Debate, relative to the Proof. MINUTE for Captain Rutherfoord,
- Mrs Elizabeth Watson v. Mrs Eliz. Stewart, alias Bowman — Information, 12 Nov 1790
- Mrs M'Ghie v. Wm. Wotherspoon — Appendix to Answers, 12 May 1836
- Peter Ferrie and Spouse v. George Ferrie and Others — Minute, 20 Dec 1856
- Petition and Complaint — & Com: H. Davidson, W. S. against the Hon
- Petition — Adam M'Leish, Merchant and [2]
- Petition — Alex. Izatt against Lord Armadale's Interlocutors
- Petition — And. Gray against Lord Henderland's Interlocutor
- Petition — Captain John Rutherford against an Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — D. Taylor against Robert Willis
- Petition — David Syme late Merchant in Perth
- Petition — George Sinclair against Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — Hon. Chas. Elphinstone against Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — Jan. 15. 1822. Pet.—John Neilson against Lord Gillies's Interlocutor [2]
- Petition — John Rutherfoord, Esq. against an Inner-House Interlocutor
- Petition — John Thomson against an Inner House Interlocutor
- Petition — John Trotter, Esq. for a Diligence to be Superseded, and an irregular Extract-decree to be called in
- Petition — M^cKenzie & Lindsay against Lord Justice Clerk's Interlocutor [2]
- Petition — Thomas Sime against Lord Cringletie's Interlocutor
- Petition — William Ogilvie for Recal of Sequestration
- Petition — Wixon and Deans, Merchants in Edinburgh, Creditors of Nicoll and Company, Tea-Merchants, Dundee, as a company, and of Joseph Nicoll, Tea-Merchant, Dundee, sole Partner of said Company, as Partner thereof and as an Individual
- RECLAIMING NOTE FOR EDWARD RAILTON, Agent in Glasgow ; ROBERT PULLMAN, Merchant in London ; and JOHN CULLEN, W.S., his Mandatory. IN
- Reclaiming Note, E. Railton, & R. Pullman & Mandatory against Lord Fullerton's Interlocutor
- Reclaiming Note, Richard S Michie against Lord Cuninghame's Interlocutor
- Reclaiming Petition — Alex. Masterton against Inner-House Interlocutor [2]
- Reclaiming Petition — Rec. Note—Edward Railton against Lord Fullerton's Interlocutor
- REVISED ANSWERS for the Respondents.
- RIDLEY & COMPANY AND MANDATORY v. SLOAN — Appendix, 28 Jul 1835
- Robert Cross v. John Cross — Bill of Advocation, 30 May 1818 [2]
- Samuel Cole and others v. Ephraim Flammare and Son — Memorial, 28 Jul 1772
- Sir John Scott of Ancrum, Baronet, and Patrick Kerr of Abbotrule, Esq v. Sir John Dalrymple of Cousland, Baronet — Replies, 14 Dec 1780
- Sommerville v. Thomson & Rutherford — 20 Jan 1813
- Stewart V. Ireland — Petition, 18 Nov 1796