Legal Subject: Conveyance |
| Case | Date | Legal Subject | Abstract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duke of Gordon v. Lord Swinton's Interlocutor | 1787 | Patronage, Charter, Succession, Act of Parliament, Interlocutor, Conveyance | Alexander, Duke of Gordon petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor issued by Lord Swinton. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Henry Peirse and Others v. Mrs Elizabeth Ross | 1791 | Adjudication, Conveyance, Infeftment, Security, Heritor, Reduction | Mrs Elizabeth Ross defended her adjudication of multiple Ayrshire lands against objections by Henry Peirse and others, asserting her right as heir and the validity of her Crown charter in response to their claims of prior or superior rights. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| John Melville v. TheCreditors of George Smiton | 1794 | Infeftment, Liferent, Succession, Ranking of Creditors, Security, Conveyance | John Melville petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor that had held void the infeftment in favor of George Gordon's heirs, opposing the creditors of George Smiton. Based on the single document cataloged for this case. |
| Stewart V. Ireland | 1796 | Conveyance, Disposition, Mandate, Diligence, Freeholder, Election contest | Charles Stewart petitioned to overturn the freeholders' refusal to enroll him on the roll of freeholders, resting his claim upon titles and a valuation certificate, and William Ireland answered that the qualification was nominal and fictitious and that no mandate had been produced. The parties exchanged replies and duplies disputing the validity of the claim and seeking commission to recover material writings, after which Ireland petitioned against an Inner-House interlocutor that had found the freeholders erred in refusing admission. Stewart subsequently moved the court to apply a recent judgment of the House of Peers and to modify the account of expenses. |
Documents discussing this subject (showing 100 of 211)
- (EXCERPT from Minute of Meeting of Committee of Management,—25th July 1826.—Vide Appendix to Reclaiming Note, No. 3, p. 4.) (EXCERPT.)
- ADDL. PET.—William Mure, Esq. against Lord Alloway's Interlocutor, on p. 5. § 6. JAS. HILL, W. S. Petitioner's Agent, ALEX. PEARSON, W. S. Respondents' Agent, Mr Hamilton, Clerk. T
- Alexander Copland Hutcheson v. Barbara Hutcheson — Answers, 13 Dec 1821
- Alexander Duff v. John Gordon — Replies, 10 Mar 1807
- Alexander Gordon v. Janet Baddon — Answers, 9 Nov 1846
- Alexander Gordon v. John Baddon — Reclaiming Note, 3 Mar 1848
- Alexander Kenneth Mackenzie v. Sir Hector Mackenzie of Gairloch, Baronet — Answers, 6 Apr 1797
- Alexander Milne v. Freeholders of Aberdeenshire — Answers, 19 Aug 1791
- Alexander Oliphant Murray v. James Scott — Answers, 12 Jun 1828
- Alexander Wight v. Francis Duggan — Answers, 16 Feb 1797
- Andrew Chalmer v. James Pringle — Answers, 29 Nov 1764
- Andrew Millar and others v. Gavin Hamilton, John Balfour, Andrew Stalker and others — Petition, 15 Jan 1747
- Ann Millar v. John Anderson, Alexander Scott, and Others — Appendix, 25 May 1814
- ANSWERS FOR Messrs. Dunmoore and Company, Merchants in Glasgow; TO THE PETITION of Robert Reid, Writer to the Signet.
- ANSWERS to the CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for Mrs Jane Galt and Dr Black, her husband; and to the CLAIM for Mrs Captain Denniston and her Son. PLEA IN LAW. ANSWERS to the CLAIM for W
- Answers — Wm. Hall, & Co. against Lord Armadale's Interlocutor
- Anthony Hannah, James Crawford, and John Brown v. Wyld, M'Haffie, and Fearon, and Robert Armour and Company — Replies
- APPENDIX TO THE ANSWERS FOR Wm. Drysdale, W.S. APPENDIX TO THE ANSWERS for William Drysdale.
- APPENDIX. Copy Letter, Mr James Orr to Mr John Campbell.
- APPENDIX. No. I. COPY—Letter from William Macdonald, Esq. W. S. TO Colonel Charles Campbell of Barbreck.
- APPENDIX. No. I. LETTER, Mr GALLOWAY to his Creditors, dated Glasgow, 17th August, 1807.
- APPENDIX. N° I. AGREEMENT betwixt Alexander Anderson of Bourtie, and William Forbes, and Thomas and James Arbuthnots.
- Arbuthnott v. Gilmour — Petition, 14 Nov 1765
- Archibald and James Robertson and Company v. John Laird — Replies, 22 May 1793
- Archibald Cuthill v. Elizabeth Govan and Others — Answers, 3 Jan 1824
- Archibald Ewing v. Jonathan Anderson — Answers, 3 Sep 1801
- Archibald Speirs of Elderslie v. James Macdowall — Petition and Complaint, 23 Nov 1790
- Arthur Duff v. Earl of Fife and Others — Petition and Complaint, 17 Nov 1826
- Barbara Baikie and Margaret Young v. Arthur Sinclair — Answers, 15 Dec 1785
- Bill of Advocation — Advocation for the Hamilton New Gas Light Company, Incorporated by Act of Parliament, 10th Victoria, chapter 118, and Walter Black, Baker in Hamilton, present Chairman; James Granger, Lace Manufacturer in Hamilton, Thomas Cuthil…
- Captain Robert Johnston of Wamphry v. William Earl of Home — Information, 23 Nov 1758
- Catherine Moir or Laurie, Mr Stevenson and Martha Stevenson v. Henry Reid Sen., John Wilson and John Gardner — Defences, 30 May 1832
- College of Glasgow v. Henry Monteith, Esq. and others — Answers, 12 Jun 1813
- COPY of the Minutes of Election referred to in the foregoing Complaint.
- Daniel Campbell of Shawfield, William Grahame younger of Gartmore, and Alexander Cunnynghame v. William Mure of Caldwall — Answers, 11 Jan 1760
- Donald Campbell v. David Campbell — Petition, 7 Aug 1776
- Donald Campbell v. James Cheape — Answers, 19 May 1795
- Duke of Gordon v. Lord Swinton's Interlocutor — Petition, 26 Jul 1787
- Dunbar Earl of Selkirk v. Robert Naesmith — answers, 13 Feb 1778
- Duncan Davidson v. Charles Macleod — Answers
- Duncan Davidson v. Colin Mackenzie — Note
- Dup.—Daniel Fisher, to the Rep.—John Buchanan, Esq
- E. Gibb & Others v. Currie's Creditors — Summons, 27 Oct 1835
- Earl of Fife v. Mrs. Martha M'Kenzie and Miss Elizabeth Fraser — Information, 4 Mar 1795
- Elizabeth and Isobel Grays, Daughters of John Gray of Rogart, deceased v. John Wood, and Others, Creditors of said John Gray — Petition, 31 Jul 1772
- EUL0281 doc0025
- Fletcher Norton v. William Anderson — Answers, 1 Jul 1813
- Fletcher Norton v. William Anderson — Answers, 1 Jul 1813 [2]
- Fletcher Norton v. William Anderson — Answers, 1 Jul 1813 [3]
- Fotheringham and Hume v. Ogilvie and Others — Petition, 12 May 1795
- George Harley Drummond v. William George Adam — Memorial, 14 Jul 1812 [2]
- George Harley Drummond, Esq. of Drumpellier v. The Honourable Charles Fleming of Cumbernauld — Answers, 28 Feb 1812
- George Ord v. Miles Barton — Answers
- Governor and Company of Undertakers for raising Thames Water in York-buildings v. Alexander Mackenzie — Minutes, 23 Feb 1793
- Governor and Company of Undertakers for raising Thames Water in York-buildings v. Alexander Mackenzie — Minutes, 23 Feb 1793 [3]
- Henry Pierse v. Mrs Elisabeth Ross — Answers, 15 Feb 1791
- Hope Stewart, James Miller and George Steel v. Sir Alexander Muir Mackenzie — Answers, 2 Oct 1823
- I.—PURSUERS' PROOF.
- IA---466A doc0003
- II.—RE-REVISED CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for William Finnie, Esq. Captain Francis Hay, and Hugh Morton, Esq. Trustees and Executors of the deceased James Mure Campbell, Esq.—Raisers
- Ilay Ferrier v. William Morehead — Petition, 16 Feb 1791
- IV.—REVISED CONDESCENDENCE and CLAIM for John Lawford Young, residing at No. 5 Alfred Street, Bath, only child of the late Major Thomas Young, and for James Bonar, W.S., his Tutor
- James Anderson and Others v. Robert Saunders — Case, 24 Feb 1831
- James Anderson v. Robert Saunders — Answers, 3 Jun 1829
- James Anderson v. Robert Saunders — Revised, 24 Feb 1831
- James Anderson, Alexander Fiddes and Alexander Cuninghame v. Robert Saunders — Condescendence
- James Charles Macrae v. Mrs Maria Le Maistre Macrae otherwise Hyndm... — Report, 15 Nov 1838
- James Cheap v. William Morehead [Copy 3] — Duplies, 7 Dec 1790
- James Dalrymple v. Archibald Montgomerie — Duplies, 6 Mar 1813 [2]
- James Davidson v. George Darsie, senior, et al. — Answers, 19 Mar 1840
- James Denniston v. Alexander Campbell — Duplies, 4 Jun 1824
- James Farie v. Sir F. W. Drummond — Complainers' Case
- James Hally v. Anne Mitchel — Information [2]
- James Hedderwick & Son v. Richard Griffin & Company — Complainers' Case, 3 Dec 1840
- James Marquis of Clydesdale and Thomas Earl of Dundonald v. The Countess of Strathmore, the Earl for his Interest, and Lady Katharine Cochran — Information, 16 Jan 1728
- James Marshall v. James Taylor and Dr. Wyville Smith — Representation, 28 Jun 1796
- James Merry v. Mary Dun or Mason — Summons, 13 Feb 1834 [2]
- James Strachan v. John Marshall Mowbray — Condescendence, 13 Oct 1840
- Jean Fleming v. Helen Wilson — Answers, 14 Jun 1810 [2]
- Jeremiah Donovan v. Samuel Shirreff — Case, 16 Jun 1742
- John Aikin v. Patrick Gordon — Replies, 26 Feb 1791
- John Anderson and Patrick Robertson v. Anne Luke and James Brisbane Wright — Memorial, 28 Feb 1765
- John Boyd v. John Crawfurd, Alexander Crawford, and James Lang — Answers, 15 Dec 1823
- John Buchanan v. Daniel Fisher — Answers, 23 Feb 1824 [2]
- John Buchanan v. Daniel Fisher — Replies, 22 Apr 1824
- John Drummond v. Sir Alexander Ramsay — 5 Jan 1809
- John Gardyne v. The Royal Bank of Scotland — Opinions of Consulted Judges, 7 Mar 1851
- John Gordon Campbell and Andrew Campbell v. Thomas Lawrie, James Reid, William Leckie Ewing, Andrew Reid, William Gilmour and James Lindsay Ewing — Answers
- John Gordon Campbell and Others v. Thomas Laurie and Others — Answers, 15 Feb 1831
- John Graham and Others v. William Clark and Others — Summons, 16 May 1818
- John Graham v. John Gibb — Answers, 21 May 1818
- John Hamilton Colt v. Caledonian Railway Company — Joint Minute, 1854
- John Johnston v. William Morehead — Answers, 21 Dec 1790
- John Johnston v. William Morehead — Replies, 23 Nov 1790
- John Johnstone v. William Morehead — Duplies, 7 Dec 1790
- John Krassaw v. Neil Earl of Roseberie — Answers, 21 Feb 1769
- John Krassaw v. Neil, Earl of Roseberie — Petition, 7 Mar 1769
- John Melville v. TheCreditors of George Smiton — Petition, 15 Jan 1794
- John Miller and Others v. Mrs Amelia Moodie or Anderson — Minute, 24 Feb 1831
- John Minto and John Gavin v. John Kirkpatrick — Reclaiming, 3 Jan 1833
