Date3 Mar 1802TypeRepliesCaseDavidson v. ElphinstoneAuthorMatthew Ross, of CandieLength49 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 18Appendix1 item (17 pp.) Abstract AI-generated Davidson replies to Elphinstone's answers, challenging invalidity of claim due to lack of mandate and defective seisin. ← Harry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — Answers, 11 Feb 18024 of 7 in this caseHarry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — 15 May 1802 →People in this documentRobert Hill, W.S.Robert Bruce, of Kennet, Lord KennetGeorge Broun, of Coalston, Lord CoalstonJames Murray, of BroughtonGeorge Vanden Bempde Johnstone, Marquess of AnnandaleDavid Dalrymple, of Westhall, Lord WesthallDonald Campbell, Esq. of BallinabySubjectsRetourFreeholderArrestmentStatuteMandateInfeftmentSeisinCourt of SessionPlaces mentionedStirlingshireCaversStirlingGlenboig