CSP 11A:1756-64 — Document 0002
Abstract
Answers by Alexander Cunnyngham of Hyndhope to the petition and complaint of Capt. Charles Napier, responding to claims of superior right to the lands of Hyndhope.
Alexander Kenneth Mackenzie v. Sir Hector Mackenzie of Gairloch, Baronet — Answers, 13 Nov 1798
Abstract
November 13, 1798 Answers by Sir Hector Mackenzie of Gairloch, Baronet, to the petition of Alexander Kenneth Mackenzie, asserting that the payment made by his factor Norman Mackenzie was valid and not subject to reduction.
Mackenzie v. An Inner-House Interlocutor — Petition, 24 Jan 1798
Abstract
January 24, 1798 Petition of Alexander Kenneth Mackenzie, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
Alexander Kenneth Mackenzie v. Sir Hector Mackenzie of Gairloch, Baronet — Answers, 6 Apr 1797
Abstract
April 6, 1797 Answers by Alexander Kenneth Mackenzie to the petition of Sir Hector Mackenzie, arguing that the conveyance of his provision was ipso jure null and void due to lack of curator consent
Mackenzie v. Mackenzie — Petition
Abstract
Petition of Sir Hector Mackenzie asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
Ralston v. Inner-House Interlocutor — Petition, 16 Nov 1797 [2]
Abstract
November 16, 1797 Petition of William Henry Ralston, Esq. asking the Court to alter Lord Swinton's interlocutor
Wilkins v. Campbell — Petition, 14 Nov 1798
Abstract
November 14, 1798 Petition of William Campbell asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
SCOS Reviewed in History: The Journal of the Historical Association
Historian Alexandra MacDonald of the College of William & Mary reviews SCOS in the journal History.
Mrs Janet Maitland and Doctor William Babington v. John Bushby Maitland — Answers, 1 Jul 1798
Abstract
July 1, 1798 Answers by John Bushby Maitland, Esq. Advocate, Defender, responding to objections for Mrs Janet Maitland, Spouse of Doctor William Babington, that Thomas Bushby is unfit as a witness
