Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Charles Edward Drummond v. Clementina Sarah Drummond Burrell — Answers, 13 Jul 1805

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by the Honourable Clementina Sarah Drummond Burrell, for her husband and Charles Selkridge, responding to the petition of Charles Edward Drummond, assuming the title of Duke of Melfort.

Charles Edward Drummond v. Clementina Sarah Drummond Burrell and Charles Selkrig — Answers, 7 Apr 1808

Abstract
AI-generated
Hon. Mrs. D. Burrell and co. answer petition by Charles Edward Drummond claiming title of Duke of Melfort.

Reclaiming Petition — Duke of Melfort for Leave to Reply

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks leave to reply to a preliminary defence disputing his right to pursue an action over the estate of Perth, claiming he is the rightful heir-male under entail and forfeiture law.

George Hally v. John and Robert Fergusson — Answers, 17 Sep 1807

Abstract
AI-generated
Martin, as tenant, defends against Fergussons' claim that his 1787 subtack was invalid and void due to lack of proper authority, asserting it was an absolute conveyance for fair consideration.

Petition — John & Robert Fergusson against Lord Craig's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners seek to void a 1789 subtack to Peter Martin, alleging trustees fraudulently obtained it by breaching fiduciary duty and deceiving John Ferguson.

John Brown and Mrs Agnes Mackie v. Charles Geddes and his Factor and Commissioner — Minute, 26 Jun 1807

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners challenge respondents' reliance on an unauthorized architectural report, submitting their own expert opinion affirming the structural safety of the disputed property.

John Brown and Mrs Agnes Mackie v. Charles Geddes and James Geddes — Answers, 25 Jun 1807

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents challenge Dean of Guild’s judgment to repair a dangerously decaying tenement, requesting jury trial due to perceived bias and lack of technical expertise.

Petition — John Brown against Lord Balmuto's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of John Brown asking the Court to alter Lord Balmuto's interlocutor passing a bill of advocation

Petition — W. Hall and Co. against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners seek review of interlocutor upholding sale of heritable property to Geddes, arguing they paid part of price to Robertson, acting as Geddes’s agent, entitling them to credit.

Answers — Wm. Hall, & Co. against Lord Armadale's Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners claim bona fide payment to bankrupt partner Robertson, who retained feudal rights, challenging validity of subsequent conveyance to Geddes.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 618
  • Page 619
  • Page 620
  • Page 621
  • Current page 622
  • Page 623
  • Page 624
  • Page 625
  • Page 626
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in