William Cadell v. Cassels, &c. — Summons, 28 Feb 1829
Abstract
William Cadell sues Robert and David Cassels for unpaid bills discounted by the Bank of Scotland, invoking their prior guarantees and protest notices.
D. & R. Cassells against Lord Newton's Interlocutor
Abstract
Defenders seek to recall an interlocutor finding against them in a claim by the Bank of Scotland's treasurer, requesting exoneration and costs.
Alexander Charles Maitland and Others v. Dame Helen Maitland Gibson and Spouse — Appendix
Abstract
Maitland Gibson seeks declaratory judgment and payment for canal route through his land, with terms including £7000 installments, £120/acre valuation, bridge, preserved watercourse, no spoil banks.
Alexander Charles Maitland, Eldest Son, and the other Children procreated of the Marriage between Alexander Gibson Maitland, Younger of Cliftonhall, Esq. advocate, v. Dame Helen Maitland Gibson of Cli… — Revised Condescendence and Answers, 6 Jul 1830
Abstract
Entailed estate heirs claim compensation for canal deviation consent belongs to the entail; defenders say it pays for temporary inconvenience only.
Alexander Charles Maitland & Others v. Dame Helen Maitland Gibson and Sir Alexander Charles Maitland Gibson — Answers, 4 Jun 1830
Abstract
Answers by the defenders to the summons of declarator and payment, arguing that the Canal Company's payment of L.7000 was for land value and not a premium, and that the pursuers have no claim to the sum.
Alexander-Charles Maitland, & Others v. Dame Helen Maitland Gibson, & Spouse — Summons, 17 May 1830
Abstract
Pursuers, heirs of entail, claim £7000 paid by canal company must be paid into bank for lawful investment per 1827 Act, as Dame Helen Gibson and spouse refused to comply.
Alexander Charles Maitland v. Dame Helen Maitland Gibson and Sir Alexander Charles Maitland Gibson — Reclaiming Note, 27 Dec 1830
Abstract
Defenders must compensate heirs of entail for permanent damage from canal deviation, with remaining funds from £7000 paid for consent.
James Fulton v. Archibald M'Allister — Reasons, 19 Jan 1830
Abstract
Archibald M'Allister, as creditor and charger, defends his heritable security against James Fulton, who claims estate rents under a trust deed without lawful authority.
James Fulton v. Archibald M'Allister — Bill of Suspension, 20 Nov 1828
Abstract
James Fulton seeks to suspend an interim decree requiring him to pay Archibald M'Allister from trust property, citing invalid title, procedural flaws, and entitlement to credit for repairs.
James Fulton v. Archibald M'Allister — Reclaiming Note, 30 Nov 1830
Abstract
James Fulton seeks to reclaim an interlocutor suspending his rights, arguing the suspender lacked authority to manage rents without charger's consent.
