SCOS Archive | The University of Virginia Law Library

Abstract

Defenders argue they were not agents but middlemen purchasing tin-plates for resale, and pursuers cannot claim full sums due to failure to act during sequestration.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuers claim defenders failed to account for tin-plate sales and seek payment of outstanding sums, interest, and composition due under guarantee.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defences for Robert Brittain Blyth and Company, asserting they were purchasers, not agents, of tin-plates from the pursuers, and thus not liable for preference in bankruptcy.

Abstract

AI-generated

Blakemore & Co. seek accounting and payment from Blyth & Co. for tin-plate sales and composition debts post-sequestration.

Abstract

AI-generated

Pursuers claim against defenders as agents under del credere commission, seeking unpaid sales proceeds from bankrupt defendants' estate.

Abstract

AI-generated

Defender denies owing balance on cattle purchases, claiming all paid in ready money except for a disputed obligation he says was fraudulently altered by pursuer.

Abstract

AI-generated

Stewart challenges Sheriff’s interlocutor ordering payment of £103 10s for unpaid livestock purchases, seeking review by Lords of Council and Session.

Abstract

AI-generated

Advocator seeks to prove payment for sheep and cow at time of delivery, challenging interlocutors and requesting expenses.

Abstract

AI-generated

James Mackenzie petitions to be appointed trustee over sequestrated estates of Macrae bankrupts, challenging Robert Forrester’s eligibility due to residence in Glasgow.

Abstract

AI-generated

Reclaiming Petition of James Mackenzie against Lord Moncreiff's interlocutor

Subscribe to

R. Blakemore & Co. v. R.B. Blyth & Co. — Revised Case, 21 Jan 1831

R. Blakemore & Co. v. R. B. Blyth & Co. — State of the Process, 19 May 1829

Richard Blakemore and Company v. Robert Brittain Blyth and Company and Robert Brittain Blyth — Defences, 11 Jun 1828

Blakemore & Co. v. Blyth & Co. — Summons, 26 Apr 1828

Richard Blakemore & Co. v. Robert Brittain Blyth & Co. and Robert Brittain Blyth — Complainers' Case, 18 Jan 1831

Samuel Gordon v. Arthur Stewart — 15 Jul 1829

Arthur Stewart v. Samuel Gordon — Bill of Advocation, 24 May 1830

Arthur Stewart v. Samuel Gordon — Reclaiming Note, 4 Jan 1831

General-Collection-of-Session-Papers-1831-12-FEB--23-FEB-221-224-257 doc0055

Reclaiming Petition — Note—James Mackenzie against Lord Moncreiff's Interlocutor