Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

James Hogg, &c. v. James Bruce, &c. — Duplies, 29 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents defend election of James Bruce as Councillor, challenging validity of interim election and vote, citing statutory time limits and lack of prior notice.

James Bruce v. James Hogg — Replies, 14 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 14, 1791 Replies of James Bruce and others, Counsellors and Magistrates of the Borough of Anstruther Easter, to the Answers of James Hogg and others, pretending to be such.

James Bruce v. James Hogg — Answers, 7 Dec 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
December 7, 1790 Answers by James Hogg, &c. to the petition and complaint of James Bruce, &c., responding that the election of Bruce was void and the vacancy was properly filled by Hogg.

James Bruce v. James Hogg — Petition and Complaint, 13 Nov 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
November 13, 1790 Petition of James Bruce, Taylor in Anstruther Easter, asking the Court to find that the Town-council of Anstruther Easter wrongfully elected James Hogg as a Counsellor in place of James Bruce, who had been legally elected and accepted.

James Bruce v. James Hogg

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

William Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther, of Anstruther — v2 179101 manuscript CampbellAnstruther

Abstract
AI-generated
Inshie contests forfeiture of his East Michaelmas seat due to non-residency, citing lack of notice and procedural fairness near a general election.

William Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther — Duplies, 29 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 29, 1791 Duplies for Sir John Anstruther, et al., Respondents, to the replies for William Campbell, et al., Complainers, arguing that the April 26, 1790 Council meeting was irregular and that the complainers' arguments are irrelevant to the legal merits.

William Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther — Answers, 7 Dec 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
Dec 7, 1790: Sir John Anstruther &c. answer petition of William Campbell &c., with John Young, W.S., responding to claims of illegal council removal and election manipulation.

William Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther, of Anstruther — Petition and Complaint, 13 Nov 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
December 13, 1790 Petition of William Campbell asking the Court to overturn the election of Philip Anstruther in place of Sir John Anstruther, and to sustain Campbell's vote as a constituent member of the Council meetings.

William Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther, of Anstruther

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 180
  • Page 181
  • Page 182
  • Page 183
  • Current page 184
  • Page 185
  • Page 186
  • Page 187
  • Page 188
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in