Alexander Milne v. Freeholders of Aberdeenshire — Reclaiming Petition, 10 Jun 1791
Abstract
June 10, 1791 Reclaiming Petition of Alexander Milne, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
Alexander Milne v. George Skene — Answers, 10 Mar 1791
Abstract
March 10, 1791 Answers by George Skene of Skene to the petition and complaint of Alexander Milne of Chapletown, arguing that Milne's freeholder qualification is nominal and fictitious and that the statutory four-month limitation cannot apply to such fraudulent claims.
Alexander Milne v. Freeholders of Aberdeenshire — Petition and Complaint, 23 Dec 1790
Abstract
December 23, 1790 Petition of Alexander Milne asking the Court to overturn the Michaelmas meeting's expunging of his name from the roll of freeholders of Aberdeen
John Gray v. John M'Aulay — Reclaiming Petition, 15 Jun 1791
Abstract
June 15, 1791 Reclaiming Petition of John Gray, asking the Court to overturn an Inner-House interlocutor dismissing his complaint against the town-clerk for issuing a commission to George Ferguson Esq.
John Gray v. John M'Aulay — Replies, 26 May 1791
Abstract
May 26, 1791 Replies for John Gray Writer in Dumbarton, to the Answers for John M'Aulay Town Clerk of Dumbarton, arguing that the clerk's affixing the burgh seal to an extract of election constitutes a legal commission.
John Gray v. John M'Aulay — Answers, 12 May 1791
Abstract
May 12, 1791 Answers by John M'Aulay to the petition and complaint of John Gray, asserting that he never made a commission in favour of George Fergusson and that the extract of minutes delivered was not a commission.
John Gray v. John M'Aulay — Petition and Complaint, 23 Feb 1791
Abstract
February 23, 1791 Petition and Complaint of John Gray asking the Court to remit the statutory penalties against John M'Aulay for making a commission to George Ferguson contrary to the Act of 16 George II c. 11.
John Gray v. John M'Aulay
Repository & Extent
William Douglas and others v. Charles Lyell — Duplies, 23 Jun 1791
Abstract
June 23, 1791 Duplies of W. Douglas and others, arguing that the cases from Linlithgowshire cited by Mr Lyell are inapplicable and their evidence insufficient
