Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Alexander Houston v. William Yule — Answers, 15 May 1821

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent argues the statute limits personal acknowledgment’s effect to the debtor, not co-debtors.

William Yule v. Alexander Houston — Bill of Advocation, 11 Jan 1820

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender William Yule argues Alexander Houston had only a jus crediti, not personal title, under a trust deed.

Patrick Wishart and Alexander Robertson v. John Harper — Answers, 5 Apr 1821

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Patrick Wishart and Alexander Robertson, Writers to the Signet, Trustees of the late Robert Gordon of Craig, to the petition of John Harper in Nether Dalveen, asserting their right to the lands of Craig and Corse under a trust-deed executed by Robert Gordon.

Patrick Wishart and Alexander Robertson v. John Harper and Others — Summons, 10 Feb 1819

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustees of Robert Gordon sue heirs of William Tait for lands under a 1753 trust settlement, claiming title via Robert Gordon’s 1815 deeds.

APPENDIX. TRUST-RIGHT and DISPOSITION of WILLIAM TAIT of Lochinkitt, to WILLIAM TAIT and THOMAS WAUCH.

Abstract
AI-generated
William Tait devises Craig and Corfe lands to trustees William Tait and Thomas Wauch for Margaret’s support and education, with rents to her or her husband, and residual rights to heirs or trustees.

Lady Mary Montgomerie and Charles Montolieu Burges v. James Morton — Answers, 3 Jan 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
Trustee seeks repayment for tenant’s farm improvements, contested by petitioners who claim repayment only due at lease end and they gained benefit from early possession.

Petition — Lady Montgomerie against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioners challenge an interlocutor holding them liable for Taylor’s creditors’ claim to value of uncompleted buildings, arguing they were not lucrati and entitled to no abatement.

Lady Mary Montgomerie and Charles Montolieu Burges v. James Morton — Minute, 9 Nov 1821

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents seek recovery of surplus rent lost after reletting farms post-Taylor’s desertion, arguing creditors can’t claim losses from their business decisions.

James Morton v. Lady Montgomerie and Charles Montolieu Burges — Minute, 9 Nov 1821

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents seek to recover losses from reletting lands after Taylor's desertion, including building costs and rent shortfall, while petitioner claims no liability as advocators assumed lease risks.

Lady Mary Montgomerie and Charles Montolieu Burgess v. James Morton — Minute

Abstract
AI-generated
Advocators seek to establish financial loss or gain from George Taylor’s abandonment of the farm, following prior interlocutor ordering production of lease and transaction records.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 158
  • Page 159
  • Page 160
  • Page 161
  • Current page 162
  • Page 163
  • Page 164
  • Page 165
  • Page 166
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in