Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

W. Weir and J. Barr v. James Gammell — Memorial, 18 Apr 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
W. Weir and J. Barr, Assessors for Greenock’s Poor, argue burghs of barony are landward parishes and must be assessed like country districts by statute and practice.

James Gammell v. William Weir and John Barr — Memorial

Abstract
AI-generated
James Gammell argues landward heritors aren’t liable for personal income assessments regardless of location, warning such taxation would cause ruinous pauperism.

James Gammell v. Collectors of Poors Rates of Greenock — Memorial, 26 Feb 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
James Gammell challenges the collectors of poor rates in Greenock over legal assessment rules for burghs and landward districts post-parish union.

James Gammell v. Collectors of Poors Rates of Greenock — Memorial, 26 Feb 1822 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Memorial of James Gammell, Esq., arguing that the Poor Rates should be assessed according to rental value rather than means and substance.

Petition — Alexander Houstoun against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of Alexander Houstoun, asking the Court to overturn an interlocutor pronouncing against him in a process of advocation.

John M'Goun v. Andrew Gairdner — Answers, 16 Jun 1821

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by John Blackwell to the petition of John M'Goun for a discharge, challenging the validity of consents obtained from creditors including James Hyde and Company and Robert Hunter

Charlotte Julia Countess Dowager of Rothes v. George William Earl of Rothes — Minute, 28 Jun 1822 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Counsel for the Earl of Rothes seek guidance on rights, timber, aliment, compromise, legal process, entail clauses, name usage, and validity of consent from Lord Milsintoun in a dispute over estate provisions and succession.

Countess Dowager of Rothes and Lady E. Leslie v. Earl of Rothes — Answers, 3 Oct 1822

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents challenge the validity of testamentary provisions granting annuities and capital sums to the petitioner’s widow and daughter, arguing they exceed the entail’s allowance and were improperly consented to.

Julia Countess and Elizabeth Leslie v. George William Evelyn Leslie, Earl of Rothes and George Leslie — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Defendants respond to petitions filed by the Countess Dowager of Rothes and Lady Elizabeth Leslie seeking unspecified relief.

Petition — The Right Honourable Charlotte Julia Countess Dowager of Rothes, and her Commissioner, Humbly Sheweth [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of the Countess Dowager of Rothes, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 156
  • Page 157
  • Page 158
  • Page 159
  • Current page 160
  • Page 161
  • Page 162
  • Page 163
  • Page 164
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in