Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Petition — James Robertson against an Inner House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of James Robertson, cow-feeder in Glasgow, asking the Court to alter an inner house interlocutor which allows defenders to enjoy undisturbed possession of his property while litigation continues.

James Robertson v. Margaret, Jean, and Agnes Robertson — Answers, 2 Feb 1809 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Margaret, Jean, and Agnes Robertson, Cowfeeders in Glasgow, to the petition of James Robertson, designed Cowfeeder there, responding to the petitioner's claim to property and possession.

Petition — James Robertson against a Bill Chamber Interlocutor of Lord Robertson

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of James Robertson, cow-feeder in Glasgow, asking the Court to alter an interlocutor of Lord Robertson and remit to the Magistrates with instructions to ordain the defenders to deliver over his property

James Mitchell and Ninian Wallace v. William Sibbald, James Rennie, and John Gow — Answers, 16 May 1809

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders, United Incorporations of Mary's Chapel, defend prior interlocutor upholding their exclusive Portsburgh work rights against petition by pursuers.

JUDICIAL ACT on Petition for SEAL of CAUSE.

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition seeks sealing of cause granting craft guild privileges and admission terms in Innerleith Barony, including rights, dues, and obligations.

Petition — Incorporation of Wrights of Portburgh against an Inner-House Interlocutor [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Wrights, Masons, and Coopers petition to alter prior interlocutor, asserting their incorporation predates 1650 contract and that it merely recognized, not created, their status.

Petition — Incorporation of Wrights of Portburgh against an Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
The Incorporation of Wrights, Masons, and Coopers in Portburgh petitions against an Inner-House interlocutor concerning their incorporation.

Incorporation of Wrights, Masons and Coopers in the Barony of Portburgh v. United Incorporations of Mary's Chapel, Edinburgh — Information, 12 May 1808 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Information of the Incorporation of Wrights, Masons and Coopers in Portburgh, arguing that their title as a free corporation is established by historical grant and judicial recognition, and that the defenders' interdict should be removed.

James Mitchell and Ninian Wallace v. William Sibbald, James Rennie and John Gow — Information, 18 Jun 1808

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders, for United Incorporations of Mary's Chapel, contest Pursuers' exclusive trade claim in Portburgh, citing historic rights and contractual subordination.

William Sibbald v. James Mitchell — Information, 18 Jun 1808

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders, representing the United Incorporations of Mary's Chapel, resist an information brought by Pursuers James Mitchell and Ninian Wallace for alleged breaches of trade regulations.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 127
  • Page 128
  • Page 129
  • Page 130
  • Current page 131
  • Page 132
  • Page 133
  • Page 134
  • Page 135
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in