Peter Hughes and James Carson v. John M'Culloch — Condescendence
Abstract
Defender denies ordering goods, says others managed procurement; pursuers claim he accepted responsibility via correspondence and field-day vote.
Peter Hughes and James Carson v. John Macculloch — Answers, 14 Dec 1808
Abstract
Answers by Peter Hughes and James Carson, Merchants, Newton-Stewart, to the petition of John Macculloch, Esq; of Barholm, responding to claims of financial responsibility for volunteer clothing.
Petition — John M'CULLOCH, Esq: against Lord Glenlee's Interlocutors
Abstract
Petition of John M'Culloch asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor against him, which found him liable for clothing furnished to his volunteer company without his commissioning or consent.
Thomas Newall v. David Ramsay — Petition, 2 Mar 1809
Abstract
Petitioner seeks review of interlocutor upholding charge by David Ramsay for unpaid bill, alleging fraud and double payment after he paid Chalmers to retire the debt.
Petition — Thomas Newall. against Lord Polkemmet's Interlocutors
Abstract
Petitioner seeks review of interlocutors refusing representation on merits, alleging fraudulent collusion between drawer and indorsee to evade payment defenses.
Thomas Newall v. David Ramsay — Answers, 8 Dec 1808 [2]
Abstract
David Ramsay answers Thomas Newall’s petition for suspension of a bill, asserting he is an onerous holder and that payment was made in full value for cattle, with evidence including a letter from Chalmers confirming the transaction.
APPENDIX. No. I. DEPOSITION of DAVID RAMSAY, in Suspension Newall against RAMSAY.
Abstract
Deposition of David Ramsay in a suspension case against Thomas Newall, detailing his agreement with Chalmers over disputed bills and cattle purchases from Niven.
Agnes, Margaret and Jean Robertson v. James Robertson — Answers, 25 Feb 1809
Abstract
Answers by Agnes, Margaret, and Jean Robertson, Cowfeeders in Glasgow, to the petition of James Robertson, designed Cowfeeder there.
APPENDIX. DECLARATION of JEAN ROBERTSON, &c.
Abstract
Defenders, including Jean Robertson, claim joint ownership of property and livestock managed under their father’s name, refusing to surrender assets to petitioner.
