Date3 Mar 1802TypeRepliesCaseDavidson v. ElphinstoneAuthorMatthew Ross, of CandieLength49 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 18Appendix1 item (17 pp.) Abstract AI-generated Davidson replies to Elphinstone's answers, challenging invalidity of claim due to lack of mandate and defective seisin. View larger map →← Harry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — Answers, 11 Feb 18024 of 7 in this caseHarry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — 15 May 1802 →People in this documentRobert Hill, W.S.✳Robert Bruce, of Kennet, Lord Kennet✳George Broun, of Coalston, Lord Coalston✳James Murray, of Broughton✳George Vanden Bempde Johnstone, Marquess of Annandale✳David Dalrymple, of Westhall, Lord Westhall✳Donald Campbell, Esq. of Ballinaby✳SubjectsRetour✳Freeholder✳Arrestment✳Statute✳Mandate✳Infeftment✳Seisin✳Court of Session✳Places mentionedStirlingshire✳Cavers✳Stirling✳Glenboig✳