Date15 May 1802TypeDupliesCaseDavidson v. ElphinstoneAuthorHenry ErskineLength39 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 18Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated Respondent defends enrollment as freeman, asserting absence abroad and lack of mandate don’t bar defense or enrollment under Scots law. View larger map →← Harry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — Replies, 3 Mar 18025 of 7 in this casePetition — Hon. Chas. Elphinstone against Inner-House Interlocutor →People in this documentHenry Erskine✳SubjectsRetour✳Freeholder✳Aliment✳Statute✳Election✳Mandate✳Election contest✳Disposition✳Places mentionedStirlingshire✳Renfrew✳Stirling✳Glenboig✳