Date11 Feb 1802TypeAnswersCaseDavidson v. ElphinstoneAuthorHenry ErskineLength24 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 18MarginaliaYesAppendix1 item Abstract AI-generated Honourable Charles Elphinstone defends his inrolling by freeholders, asserting it was lawful despite his absence and lack of mandate, as agent-produced titles implied consent. View larger map →← Petition and Complaint — & Com: H. Davidson, W. S. against the Hon3 of 7 in this caseHarry Davidson v. Charles Elphinstone — Replies, 3 Mar 1802 →People in this documentHenry Erskine✳Robert Bruce, of Kennet, Lord Kennet✳SubjectsRetour✳Freeholder✳Statute✳Mandate✳Sasine✳Title✳Evidence✳Agent✳Places mentionedStirlingshire✳Stirling✳Glenboig✳