Suit by Simon Berard of Berard, Freres & Co. and Alexander Young, W.S. his attorney to recover against Mr. Hunter for the value of Madeira wine sold in Calcutta for an amount to be paid from the proceeds of the sale of muslin consigned by Mr. Hunter to Messrs Berard aboard the Carnatic. The muslins were lost during the return journey to Lorient when the Carnatic was seized by the Liverpool Privateer the Mentor. Although Messrs Berard had contracted to procure insurance for the cargo, the breakout of war between France and England in 1778 (six months after the contract was signed) caused a hike in insurance prices and the goods were only insured for 10,000 livres tournois instead of the £3,000 agreed to in the contract. Berard argued the change in circumstances excused his failure to insure and sued for £1,764, the value of the Madeira less the insurance money recovered. Defender countersued for the difference between the Madeira and the muslin. The court held that in mercantile practice a contract to insure imposes an absolute and unconditional obligation, thus Messrs Berard were required to acquire insurance in either England or France. No expenses due by defender. Berard issued a reclaiming petition, but while the answers were being prepared, Mr. Berard and other members of his family suffered death by guillotine.
Documents in this case (6)
- Appendix. (in processing)Pursuer seeks recovery of Madeira wine value from defender, who failed to insure goods as agreed, despite sending orders and facing wartime insurance impossibility.
- Simon Berard v. Robert Hunter — Information, 11 Oct 1792October 11, 1792 Information of Robert Hunter, Esq. of Campie, arguing that Messrs Berard, Freres & Co. are liable for loss due to their failure to insure muslins consigned to them
- Simon Berard v. Robert Hunter — Information, 16 May 1793Information of Simon Berard and Alexander Young, arguing that Messrs Berard, Brothers and Company were not bound to insure goods on the Carnatic for Mr. Hunter, as no such obligation existed under their agreement.
- Simon Berard v. Robert Hunter, Esq. — Information, 16 May 1793 [2]Information of Simon Berard, against Robert Hunter, Esq., arguing that the defender is liable for debts incurred during his time as a merchant in Bengal.
- Hunter — Petition, 27 Nov 1793November 27, 1793 Reclaiming Petition of Robert Hunter, Esq. of Campie, asking the Court to overturn the Inner-House interlocutor remitting the case to the Lord Ordinary
People & places in this case
People involved
- Simon Bérard — Pursuer
- Robert Hunter, Esq. — Defender
- Alexander Young, W.S., of Harburn — Advocate for Pursuer
- Robert Blair, of Avontoun, Lord Avontoun — Advocate for Pursuer
- William Tait — Advocate for Defender
- John MacLaurin, Lord Dreghorn — Lord Ordinary
- Hubert Le Loup de Beaulieu — Named in case documents
- Berard, Freres et Co. — Named in case documents
- John Berard — Named in case documents
- John Fergusson — Named in case documents
- Thomas Kelfall — Named in case documents
- Carnatic — Named in case documents
- John Dawson — Named in case documents
- Peter Baker — Named in case documents
- William Stainforth — Named in case documents