Petitioner seeks review of interlocutor reversing prior judgments, arguing he was sold malt for cash but was forced to accept a bill, and now seeks interest and expenses after payment was made under interim decree.
Respondents challenge petition’s validity, claiming conclusions against Armour and Co. are invalid as they weren’t parties, and poindings are lawful under §1621 despite trust deed.
Replies by Anthony Hannah, James Crawford, and John Brown to the Answers of Wyld, M'Haffie, and Fearon, and Robert Armour and Company, Merchants in Glasgow, arguing that the trust-deed vested property rights before poindings.
Respondents challenge a trust deed executed by debtor to petitioners as fraudulent and void under 1621 Act, seeking to recall interdict and dismiss petition.
Agnes Watson, destitute despite a legal settlement, seeks parochial relief denied by Ancrum’s Heritors and Kirk-Session; court finds entitlement but can’t enforce due to husband’s partial responsibility and others’ aid.