Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Petition — The Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of Montrose against John Mill, & Peter Crooks, W

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of the Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of Montrose, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor

APPENDIX. No. I. SET OF THE BURGH OF QUEENSFERRY

Abstract
AI-generated
Queensferry burgh council elects magistrates and councillors under a new set established by committee, with protest over non-seamen elected to sea councillor roles.

James Watson v. James Grindlay — Answers, 16 Nov 1824 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent challenges a justice's judgment declaring his indenture forfeited and delivered to the complainer, arguing the justices exceeded jurisdiction by annuling the contract.

James Watson v. James Grindlay — Reasons, 19 Jan 1826

Abstract
AI-generated
James Watson, a journeyman currier, contests a justice of the peace’s declaration that his indenture with apprentice James Grindlay is forfeited, arguing the justices exceeded jurisdiction and that his status does not invalidate the indenture.

James Watson v. James Grindlay — Answers, 16 Nov 1824

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent challenges justices’ power to forfeit an apprentice indenture, claiming it exceeds their jurisdiction and invalidates the contract.

James Watson v. James Grindlay — State of the Process, 13 Jul 1825

Abstract
AI-generated
James Watson, a journeyman currier, challenges a justice's interlocutor declaring his indenture with apprentice James Grindlay forfeited, arguing the justices exceeded jurisdiction and the indenture remains valid.

James Watson v. James Grindlay — Revised Case, 1 Jun 1826

Abstract
AI-generated
Parties instructed to prepare, revise, and lodge cases by specified box-days, with printed copies to be submitted to the Lords' boxes for reporting by May sederunt-day.

John Watt v. David Blair — Condescendence, 21 Jun 1825

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender David Blair, Stamp-Master, sued by merchant John Watt for malicious seizure of linseed, alleging lawful conduct and good faith, while pursuer claims damages from deliberate abuse of office and false representations to authorities.

Petition — Sir Patrick Walker against Lord Mackenzie's Interlocutors

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner challenges interlocutors enforcing pleasure-ground obligations from Mr Forbes’s feu charter, asserting he must honor prior feuar agreements.

Roger Ramsay v. Burgh of Dundee — 12 Feb 1824

Abstract
AI-generated
Ramsay and others sued Dundee burgh, sheriff, and Crown for aliment during imprisonment after conviction for assault, seeking legal obligation to pay daily sustenance.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 227
  • Page 228
  • Page 229
  • Page 230
  • Current page 231
  • Page 232
  • Page 233
  • Page 234
  • Page 235
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in