Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

REC. NOTE—J. LOW'S TRUSTEES, AGAINST Lord Medwyn's Interlocutor. C. F. Davidson, W. S. Defenders' Agent. Jas. Burness, S. S. C. Pursuer's Agent. Mr. Fergusson, Clerk.

Abstract
AI-generated
Court finds agreement between John Low and John Walker was security for £299, with reconveyance upon repayment; orders defender to account for rents and remaining debt.

Lyal v. Cooper — Opinion, 10 Sep 1808

Abstract
AI-generated
Tenant failed to remove grass at lease end, claiming harvest right under Keith v. Logies, but court held 'grass' meant pasture land to be vacated, not a crop.

James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Answers, 1832 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Lords Justice Clerk, Glenlee, Cringletie, Meadowbank, Mackenzie, Corehouse, and Moncreiff to questions submitted to the consulted judges in causa Lyall against Cooper.

James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — 2 Dec 1831 [3]

Abstract
AI-generated
Interlocutor remitting lease dispute over grass removal timing and lease clauses to Second Division Lords for opinion on legal principles and practice.

James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Opinion, 14 May 1830

Abstract
AI-generated
Court remits case to Second Division and permanent Lords Ordinary for written opinions on lease terms and removal rights regarding hay land.

James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Answers, 1832

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by the Lords of the Court to questions submitted in causa Lyall against Cooper, responding to the argument that sown grass should be treated as a corn crop under the lease terms.

James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Answers, 7 Apr 1831

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent objects to advocator's minute as irregular, claiming it introduces new averments without reference to closed record, violating Sederunt 1828 and procedural rules.

James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Bill of Advocation, 27 Jul 1827

Abstract
AI-generated
Tenant Robert Cooper seeks to retain possession of hay crop despite lease ending at Whitsunday 1827, challenging sheriff-depute’s removal decree.

James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Answers, 10 Sep 1808 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Defender argues res judicata bars claim over grass removal timing, asserting lease expired with hay crop separation and he complied with cropping obligations.

James Lyall v. Robert Cooper — Bill of Advocation, 1 Feb 1830 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Lyall seeks to reclaim farm of Mains of Gallery from Cooper, who refuses to vacate grass lands despite lease terms and local custom requiring removal at Whitsunday 1827.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 215
  • Page 216
  • Page 217
  • Page 218
  • Current page 219
  • Page 220
  • Page 221
  • Page 222
  • Page 223
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in