Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Mrs Anna Wedderburn Ogilvy and Peter Wedderburn Ogilvy, Esq. v. James Lawson — Answers, 10 Apr 1828

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Mrs Anna Wedderburn Ogilvy and Peter Wedderburn Ogilvy, Esq., her Husband, responding to the defences or objections for James Lawson.

Mrs Anna Wedderburn Ogilvy and Peter Wedderburn Ogilvy v. James Lawson — Duplies, 18 Feb 1828

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of James Lawson, Tenant at Castle-Nairne, asking the Court to remit the pursuers' claim for rent and damages on grounds of defective title and procedural informality in the summons.

Mrs Anna Wedderburn Ogilvy of Ruthven and Husband v. James Lawson — Replies

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim additional rent for 1826 and 1827 deviations from crop rotation; defender denies liability and counters with surface damage claim, which pursuers deem compensated by fence interest.

David Lillie v. Mrs Margaret Lillie or Smith, Jacob Smith, and Mrs Paterson Lillie or Craik — Answers, 1 Sep 1831

Abstract
AI-generated
Defendants deny existence of holograph letter by Miss Seton to Miss Lillie, claiming it was never written or acknowledged, and that the pursuer’s claim to £1000 is unfounded.

Messrs Learmonth and Company and John Learmonth v. Joseph Beck — 20 May 1828

Abstract
AI-generated
Pursuers claim L25 6s 6d for goods supplied to defender via agents in 1823, defended on prescription and account validity.

Convener Chambers and Others v. Doctor Maclagan and Others — Answers

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Convener Chambers and Others to the Reasons of Protest for Doctor Maclagan and Others, arguing that the resolution in question does not amount to a virtual renouncement of a vested right of the Town Council.

No XIX. EXTRACT JUDGMENT of the GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the CHURCH of SCOTLAND, in the Case of the Rev. John Hunter.

Abstract
AI-generated
General Assembly of the Church of Scotland affirms Synod’s rejection of appeal by ministers and elders seeking to admit John Hunter as successor to Dr Simpson, instructing Presbytery to await civil court ruling on council’s presentation rights.

EXTRACT JUDGMENT of the GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the CHURCH of SCOTLAND, in the Case of the Rev. John Hunter.

Abstract
AI-generated
Edinburgh Town Council presents Rev. John Hunter as assistant and successor to Rev. Dr. William Simpson at Tron Church, conditional on Simpson settling provision satisfactory to Presbytery of Edinburgh.

Magistrates of Edinburgh v. Reverend John Hunter — Answers, 1 Jun 1831

Abstract
AI-generated
Defenders assert the presentation of Reverend John Hunter as assistant and successor to Dr Simpson was lawful, necessary, and properly executed by the Town Council under its patronage rights.

Index to Reclaiming Note for Adam Luke and others In the Reduction of the Presentation in favor of the Rev. John Hunter as Assistant and Successor To the Rev. Dr. Simpson in the Tr

Abstract
AI-generated
Adam Luke and others sought reduction of presentation favoring Rev. John Hunter as successor to Rev. Dr. Simpson in Tron Church, with Hunter and Magistrates defending; record closed with interlocutor and action at magistrates' instance.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 213
  • Page 214
  • Page 215
  • Page 216
  • Current page 217
  • Page 218
  • Page 219
  • Page 220
  • Page 221
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in